Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

@0xtero@beehaw.org cover
@0xtero@beehaw.org avatar

0xtero

@0xtero@beehaw.org

Glorified network janitor. Perpetual blueteam botherer. Friendly neighborhood cyberman. Constantly regressing toward the mean. Slowly regarding silent things.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

0xtero , to Privacy in Remove Modem/SimCard from a Car
@0xtero@beehaw.org avatar

When I was last working in the automotive industry about two decades ago, a lot of effort was being put into protecting BIOS on diagnostic laptops, so that only "authentic" manufacturer diagnostic tools could be used to service the vehicles.

Pretty sure that development has continued.

0xtero , to Privacy in Can I edit .docx files without a Microsoft 365 subscription and if not are there any alternatives
@0xtero@beehaw.org avatar

LibreOffice will do just fine reading and writing the format as long as you don't care too much about small formatting/layout differences.

It will also struggle if you've embedded other office components into your documents (like excel embedded in word).

0xtero , to Free and Open Source Software in What comes after open source? Bruce Perens is working on it • The Register
@0xtero@beehaw.org avatar

Thanks for the share.
Obviously Perens is one of the FOSS OG figures and he makes a lot of good points. Lately the RHEL/IBM situation has shown a mere license text file isn't going to keep megacorps from finding ways to circumvent the ideology and the purpose behind it. They have simply too many resources both in development and in legal departments and too many ways to work around the legalese of its intended purpose .

Also there's been an increasing trend where products (Elastic etc) start off with FOSS license and as soon as they gain critical mass, they split their product and switch to their own FOSS-light license and gimped "community edition" downloads. Again, all still legally above the board, but at the same time completely ignoring the intended purpose of the license in the first place.

I think what Perens is proposing is too complicated. I understand that "contract" has far more binding legal fire power compared to a "license", but as he also points out in the article, it complicates things to the point where it's hard to adopt. The problem is of course far deeper than just licensing and has its roots deep somewhere in late-stage capitalism and deregulation of corporate entities and those are of course not problems that Perens or the free software community can easily solve. Unfortunately.

It's clear that something new is needed and I appreciate the work he is doing. I'm not sure it's the right direction to take, but can't say I have any rabbits I can pull out of my hat either, so I'll follow this with interest.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines