Their first privacy iteration was that they people looking at your naked body would be hiding in some back room and would indicate to the gate agents there was something to look for. I still kind of assume that's the case (article doesn't go into it). Seems like it would be more accurate than software.
Repeated security audits at major airports such as YYZ show repeated and regular occurrences of airside staff not getting screened for weeks at a time.
Essentially, many airside staff don’t get screened much, but passengers get the Theatre. Recommendations from repeated audits to change this did nothing.
CBC has a whole piece on it. Once post 911, and again years later (nothing changed).
So many holes in airport security, it’s ridiculous when compared to the passengers’ routine denigrations.
The security is pretty much theatre. Anyone who isn’t an idiot acting on a whim will be able to get anything (within reason) they want past security and onto a plane.
Take a look at the stats on the number of incidents airport security has actually stopped. You see a whole bunch of “airport security stopped this number of guns/knives/etc” but 99.999999% of them were just people forgetting them in the wrong bag.
Hell, I brought a knife onto a plane at least a half dozen times by accident, only realizing when the knife I lost months before fell out at a hotel.
I am a "regular" flyer and a stoner and I never fail to bring with me a sample of devil's lettuce when I'm leaving for extended period of time and never once I've had any issue bringing my hazardous material with me.
One time I even embarked with a small firework in my wallet I forgot I placed there after a party and none bat an eye.
the scanners are usually not technically x-ray, some are mm wave, some are xray backscatter.
the technology can see through clothes and produce a grainy bw image of a naked person
the tech is very closed, and the customers are NDA'd into not letting the public know anything
the enhanced privacy changes don't change the device - its still taking naked pictures of people, its just doesn't show them to the operator.
before you look, as of a couple years ago there are just about 6 images from these devices out there on the internet.
(iirc, there is a researcher who bought one off of ebay to study, but lost track of their work. )
its in use in border patrol type operations to see into the trailers, trucks and cars.
no one can prove they aren't keeping a database of naked people. ;-)
unilad.com
Oldest