This just fundamentally doesn't understand what artificial general intelligence means. It's not a fancy way of saying "human but smarter". That's just wrong. It's an artificial intelligence that's good at a lot of different things. You know. General. Someday, if we live long enough, we will create an AI capable of figuring things out that it wasn't designed for and we didn't teach it. Maybe that will be tomorrow. Maybe it's still centuries away. It's actually really hard to figure out how long it will take us. Making a really good text generation algorithm doesn't make the concept of learning more than one thing obsolete though. And predicting what text goes in a bar exam after being given a massive sample of bar exams isn't the same thing as learning to be a lawyer.
Tech bros with more money than sense suing each other over terms they don't understand is not a rational system to base research off of, and we should ignore them.