An example of knowing that something ‘is not’ without defining what ‘is’.
So can you define what reason is not?
I have a dismissive attitude towards things like the Turing test because they’re only empirical insofar as they empirically record a subjective opinion.
Then you have a dismissive attitude toward much of science.
Similarly, with the Othello study, my problem is not with their data, but what they attempt to extrapolate from it.