Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

arlaerion , (edited )

Yeah, read it. Also the article with the discussion on the death toll.
31 immediate deaths
60 attributable in the following two decades

The official WHO estimate with 4000 more cancer deaths until 2050 is based on the disputed LNT model. Even UNSCEAR itself says:

The Scientific Committee does not recommend multiplying very low doses by large numbers of individuals to estimate numbers of radiation-induced health effects within a population exposed to incremental doses at levels equivalent to or lower than natural background levels.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/let-s-separate-the-urban-myths-from-chernobyl-s-scientific-facts-20190705-p524f7.html

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/apr/05/anti-nuclear-lobby-misled-world

Dr. Thomas shares that contrary to popular belief there is a scientific consensus that the Chernobyl accident has resulted in the deaths of less than 55 people as a result of radiation.

The two airship accidents with the most casualties count together 120 dead (USS Akron and Dixmude).

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • incremental_games
  • random
  • meta
  • All magazines