Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

KryptonNerd

@KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Can we all agree that whatever version of predictive text we have nowadays is crap, and has been for a long time?

I'm sick of random capitalisations mid sentence. I'm sick of common words being replaced by less common ones or even downright nonsense. I'm sick of it taking three attempts to successfully get the word I want. I swear it's been like this for five years or more. Can we have a better version yet, or at least the old one back?

KryptonNerd ,

Never heard of planet computers until you mentioned the Cosmo Communicator. Their products look really cool!

KryptonNerd ,

Wait, do people genuinely defend moves like this?

Scientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed article | It's unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review. (arstechnica.com)

Scientists aghast at bizarre AI rat with huge genitals in peer-reviewed article | It's unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review.::It's unclear how such egregiously bad images made it through peer-review.

KryptonNerd ,

Retractions are important in case issues with the method are found after publication. For example, if it turns out a piece of equipment was improperly calibrated and so the results can't be trusted, a retraction of any work based on those results would be expected.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines