Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

Tartas1995

@Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Tartas1995 ,

I think the argument for moderation is the worst in the religious context.

Pascal was right about his Wager in one way. If god exists, it should change everything for you. Especially the christian one. Eternity in pain or pleasure outweighs everything.

If that is your reality, how is failing god moderation?

Seriously if you don't want people to die from cancer at all, how is that not extermist?

Are reference point defines "moderation"? Look at us vs eu politics.

Even if you want to define moderation as the average or median position in a society, then Nazism can be moderation if you get enough Nazi together.

Wake up, my fellow extremist.

Tartas1995 ,

Look the games up in protondb for user experiences. Also Proton is not a Garantie. I have a great experience with proton and steam deck is running with proton, so valve makes money with proton and improve it daily. But it is NOT A SURE THING.

Again great tool, but it has a limit. E.g. valorant doesn't run.

Tartas1995 ,

I am not sure... I am bad with languages and have been forced to learn too many. Could have been french kicking in, idk. I am confused by languages.

Tartas1995 ,

Thanks mate. Take care!

Tartas1995 ,

That is surprisingly accurate

Tartas1995 ,

I think there is a difference between being exposed to evidence of the contrary and sitting on it for a while. I don't think you can change someone's mind in a conversation. Rarely so. But if the person is "forced" to think about the topic and the evidence, eventually they will change their mind.

Tartas1995 ,

He thinks saying, I am cisgendered, is hate speech.

He literally wrote other- isms ... Criticism, I guess. He is an idiot.

Tartas1995 ,

I feel like if a blog post presents 2 options and labels one as the "scientific" one... And it is a deserved Label. Then there is probably a easy case to be made that we should teach children how to understand scientific papers and solve the equation in it themselves.

Honestly I feel like it reads better too but that is just me

Tartas1995 ,

I mean the blog post says

"If you are a student at university, a scientist, engineer, or mathematician you should really try to ask the original author what they meant because strong juxtaposition is pretty common in academic circles, especially if variables are involved like in $a/bc$ instead of numbers."

It doesn't say scientific but...

Tartas1995 ,

My comment was directed to the blog post and the claims contained in it.

The blog post claims it is popular in academy, if that is a deserved label, then I don't understand how the author of the post lands on "there is no good or bad way, they are all valid". I am in favor of strong juxtaposition but that is not the case that I am making here. Sorry for the confusion.

Tartas1995 ,

The internet laughs at the USA for it's stupid politics. Random internet user/troll: you can't criticize American politics!!!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines
    •