Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

doughless

@doughless@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • doughless , (edited )

    It's very close to begging the question, though. It really depends on OP's actual intent, which is hard to determine through text. But it does seem like it could have a, "Those of you who still hate GrapheneOS, why are you wrong?" tone to it.

    Edit: Reading through OP's comments, they do sound genuine to me, I'm mostly just explaining why someone might mistake the post for begging the question.

    doughless ,

    Begging the question is a logical fallacy that assumes the conclusion within the premise. If OP was not being genuine, then the faulty conclusion would be "there are no good reasons to dislike GrapheneOS, therefore why do people dislike GrapheneOS?"

    doughless ,

    Maybe I have the wrong fallacy, or I'm just really stretching on this one.

    This was my line of thinking:

    • premise = there are no valid reasons to dislike X
    • conclusion = people who dislike X don't have any valid reasons
    doughless ,

    Thanks, I had considered linking a reference, but I didn't think he was disputing the definition. He was disputing my analysis that this was a valid example of the fallacy.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines