Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

@kn98@feddit.nl avatar

kn98

@kn98@feddit.nl

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]

    •
    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    Both based on Bing’s search engine

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    I only like two cryptocurrencies.

    Nano: free transactions, each wallet runs it’s own blockchain, so it’s got no negative impact on the environment.

    Monero: allows for anonymous transfers

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    I like it as a way to donate to creators without revealing my identity. It comes close to handing over cash.

    You could also use it to pay for a VPN, but since the VPN provider sees your original IP address anyways, I don’t think that’s useful.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    No, because I’m not a trader. It’s not all about the exchange rate for me, but about the utility of the coin.

    Most coins exist because other coins exist. Nano and Monero not necessarily.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    Initial distribution was through a captcha-protected crypto ‘faucet’. The faucet is still up. Did the developers keep a large part of the coins themselves? I’ve never heard that.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    No, because one transaction uses as much energy as a normal household in a year. Or something like that.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    Right. But if things do start to cost money, should that be stopped by laws?

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    I just want to say that you’re absolutely wonderful with words!

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    Why’s that?

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    Could you name an example of those consequences?

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    But how is that a consequence of shadowbanning?

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    It seems to me that’s it’s often the conspiracy-theorists that get shadowbanned.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    No stats at all, I just got that impression. It’s silly, but it’s often argued that social media are private platforms, that can decide themselves what content they allow. Do you suggest laws against shadowbanning should be a thing? I’m not sure that’s a good idea.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    I agree with your first two paragraphs.

    The third, well, it’s your choice to choose not to have children. That’s fine and I understand. But people shouldn’t feel obligated not to get children to save the climate.

    Not that you’re suggesting that, just clarifying.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    Believing we’re living in the end of times is nothing new. Up til now, it never turned out true.

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    Dutch court convicts engieneer, not Dutch engieneer gets convicted.

    Honest question, what do you mean by this? What’s the difference really?

    kn98 ,
    @kn98@feddit.nl avatar

    I see, thanks.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines
    •