myliltoehurts

myliltoehurts , 4 months ago to 196 in response to recent trends rule

I'm not sure how to respond to this, your answers lack detail or arguments to respond to. What difference does chartered Vs private make for emissions? It's the same types of jets, just changes who actually owns them. It also makes no difference to the entire tax subsidized argument either.

As to "how many times", as I said above I haven't found a clear answer, but different sources claim between 10x and ~40x, even assuming the very low end of 10x, that's a big difference. I assume the per passenger emission is hard to measure since the number of passengers on a plane make a big difference.

Either way, I believe I made my points in detail several times now, and as I said your responses don't really raise points or include much detail to further things, so I'm going to leave it here.

myliltoehurts , 4 months ago to 196 in response to recent trends rule

As mentioned above, airport and airlines are heavily subsidized, this includes private airports and jets. For a limo, taxes pay for the road - but everyone can drive on it, so it'd exist with or without them. Maybe a better comparison would be if she had a bus that she travelled in alone, compared to the average person that'd be equally ridiculous.

The emissions of a limo is pretty much in line with the emissions of a family car. Most people wouldn't have a small car and a family car for when they're alone, so even if someone is alone on a limo, they're probably not doing much more harm than the average person.

A private jet's emissions are significantly more per passenger than a commercial plane. Even if a private jet always flies at max capacity - which I'd bet rarely happens - it'll cause significantly more emissions per person than a commercial plane (it's difficult to link a source here as I've not found an exact number. The estimates I've found range between 10 to 43x. Even assuming just 10x that's quite a difference)

myliltoehurts , 4 months ago to 196 in response to recent trends rule

Yes, an airport limits the amount of people, has a very high coverage of surveillance and a high ratio of security staff as well as an entry barrier and dedicated VIP areas. A generic place outside has none of that. Although feel free to elaborate on how an airport is worse for security than just being on a street, anywhere.

To your second point, sure she doesn't need to own them like nobody else does, but the issue (for me) is not primarily that she (or anyone) owns one, but that they [private jets and private airports] exist, and they're subsidized by us as it was pointed out above. If anything, they should be priced outrageously so using them would come down last resort or emergency situations, and the money from that could help balance the cost of the "public" infrastructure. This is a failure of the government, but equally so of the rich who choose to continue using them for their luxury.

myliltoehurts , 4 months ago to 196 in response to recent trends rule

If that were true, there'd be a riot every time a very famous person goes outside for any reason.

I'm sure she'd be approached and photographed and her privacy violated as much as people can get to her in a private lounge, but unless they were to advertise she is going to a certain airport at a specific time, it's incredibly unlikely she'd be mobbed. Ironically, flying publicly would make her movements harder to follow.

She can certainly afford to pay for 10 extra first class tickets for her staff, it'd most likely be much cheaper than owning her own jet. I'm sure the airports would also be thrilled to offer a private entrance and area for her/other famous people to be able to avoid even walking to her VIP lounge. Maybe they could help subsidize the airports instead of average people's taxes paying for their private airports in part.

myliltoehurts , 4 months ago to Memes in Raising prices you say? Oh that's too bad.

I've been looking for plexamp alternatives for jellyfin/emby - if you're interested https://symfonium.app/ seems pretty cool (it costs like $5 for a lifetime purchase but has a trial). It also works with Plex.

myliltoehurts , 4 months ago to Memes in Raising prices you say? Oh that's too bad.

Jellyfin is a fork of emby from the time when emby went closed source. They are very similar, emby has a similar thing to Plex pass (emby premiere) to monetize for extra features, but it's not enshittified (yet, maybe - who knows).

I'm not sure if it's available without premiere but it has the intro detection and skip feature, which is one of the main things I miss from jellyfin. I also prefer the app on android TV for some small reasons (over jellyfin). I'm not sure if it's overall better, especially if you hadn't already paid for it - I got a lifetime pass on it for cheap once.

myliltoehurts , 5 months ago to Technology in UK law that could ban Apple security updates worldwide is an unprecedented overreach

If they forced the maintainer of some FOSS software to merge in some code, even if the maintainer isn't even allowed to speak about it eventually someone would notice (since open source), fork the project and just cherry pick out their crap. Then it's whack-a-mole of trying to keep people from multiplying it.

Or they could claim the software is illegal and have no way to enforce that either.

So basically as long as said software is useful for more than a handful of people, it's infeasible to try to enforce it (e.g. see how it goes every time some software gets a cease and desist, they end up even more popular than before)

myliltoehurts , 5 months ago to Memes in No doubt. Wanna fight me?

You joke but I do actually drink my rum with a few drops of water