Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here! Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!
BlanK0 , 5 months ago First one definitely 😂
First one definitely 😂
EvolvedTurtle , 5 months ago Right Because the left would get significantly more difficult once you start adding more pants
Right Because the left would get significantly more difficult once you start adding more pants
eltimablo , 5 months ago If a pants's pants wore pants, what would it look like?
If a pants's pants wore pants, what would it look like?
AgentGrimstone , 5 months ago Okay, which one of you wears pants on each leg?
Okay, which one of you wears pants on each leg?
hperrin , 5 months ago Pants have the same number of legs as people. This joke is getting absurd.
Pants have the same number of legs as people. This joke is getting absurd.
solivine , 5 months ago That's the joke
That's the joke
hperrin , 5 months ago Yes. And it’s absurd.
Yes. And it’s absurd.
solivine , 5 months ago It's a type of humour I suppose, I like absurd humour that makes fun of the concept
It's a type of humour I suppose, I like absurd humour that makes fun of the concept
RagingRobot , 5 months ago So you're saying the one in the right then?
So you're saying the one in the right then?
veroxii , 5 months ago Asked my 10 year old. Definitely the right hand side. "Because on the left the pants are now shorts."
Asked my 10 year old. Definitely the right hand side. "Because on the left the pants are now shorts."
starman2112 , 5 months ago Did the pants on the left split its legs down the middle?
Did the pants on the left split its legs down the middle?
ForestOrca , 5 months ago Eschew bifurcated clothing!!
Eschew bifurcated clothing!!
ReverendIrreverence , 5 months ago Like on the right. Left side is wasteful and floppy
Like on the right. Left side is wasteful and floppy
