Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

Did ad blockers survive YouTube's offensive? Letting numbers talk

TL;DR version:

  • From June to August, the number of active users of the AdGuard Ad Blocker extension for Chrome dropped by about 8%. But in late August, the trend reversed. The temporary slump in user growth was offset by the increased demand in the second half of the year.

  • After a brief period of turbulence that lasted about a month, we saw the trend stabilize. And while the daily number of uninstalls was still higher than before YouTube's crackdown, it remained consistently lower than the number of daily installs.

  • After media reports and YouTube’s own statements implied that ad blockers were doomed, and especially after more and more users started noticing that their ad blocking extensions were not working properly on YouTube, we did indeed see a spike in uninstalls. However, at the same time, the number of installs also increased significantly! It may well be that the way ad blockers’ woes were amplified in the media inadvertently boosted their popularity and helped them woo new users.

  • The takeaway from all of this is that ad blockers — first and foremost, ad-blocking extensions — were rocked by YouTube’s onslaught, but survived. And, moreover, the interest has rebounded, as is evidenced by the growth in the number of active users.

zkfcfbzr ,

I saw the Youtube banner telling me it detected an ad blocker and wouldn't let me watch a lot for about a week. Now it's been over two months with nothing but smooth sailing on μBlock Origin. I'm even back to being able to block Shorts from appearing on my sub feed, where before it seemed like any YT-specific filters would let them detect the blocker.

Sinful ,

How do you block shorts? Please and thanks.

Z3k3 ,

I recently found Firefox has extensions for blocking them on your homepage works a treat with app an sponsor block.

Added them the last time my hide for 30 days expired and the option was gone.

Seriously why the fuck would I want to watch vertical videos on my desktop that if I wasn't blocking them would be bookends by ads longer than the fucking video

prole ,
@prole@sh.itjust.works avatar

I know that the re-vanced app on Android has a setting to remove them. Not sure about desktop.

moody ,

There's a set of filters that hides them from your feed and from search results. If I remember tonight, I'll share it when I'm back on my home computer.

moody ,

Here's my list of uBO filters that hides Shorts from Youtube

! Hide all videos containing the phrase ""
youtube.com#-grid-video-renderer:has(-title:has-text())
youtube.com#-grid-video-renderer:has(-title:has-text())
youtube.com#-grid-video-renderer:has(-title:has-text())
youtube.com#-grid-video-renderer:has(-title:has-text())
! Hide all videos with the shorts indicator on the thumbnail
youtube.com#-grid-video-renderer:has([overlay-style="SHORTS"])
youtube.com#-rich-item-renderer:has([overlay-style="SHORTS"])
youtube.com#-video-renderer:has([overlay-style="SHORTS"])
youtube.com#-item-section-renderer.ytd-section-list-renderer[page-subtype="subscriptions"]:has(ytd-video-renderer:has([overlay-style="SHORTS"]))
! Hide shorts button in sidebar
youtube.com#-guide-entry-renderer:has-text(Shorts)
youtube.com#-mini-guide-entry-renderer:has-text(Shorts)
! Hide shorts section on homepage
youtube.com#-rich-section-renderer:has(-shelf-header:has-text(Shorts))
youtube.com#-reel-shelf-renderer:has(.ytd-reel-shelf-renderer:has-text(Shorts))
! Hide shorts tab on channel pages
! Old style
youtube.com#-yt-paper-tab:has(.tp-yt-paper-tab:has-text(Shorts))
! New style (2023-10)
youtube.com#-tab-shape:has-text(/^Shorts$/)
! Remove empty spaces in grid
youtube.com#-rich-grid-row,.ytd-rich-grid-row:style(display: contents !important)

frazorth ,

I haven't observed any problems with uBlock Origin on Firefox.

lemmyvore ,

For those curious how efficient these things are, recently I did some tests using this tool (clear your cache between tests).

I had decided to install an additional DNS blocker on my OpenWRT router so I was curious how these methods stack up against each other.

I tested uBlock Origin (default lists, reports 116k network filters), the Firefox (122) built-in ETP (Enhanced Tracking Protection) and the router adblock (only a modest 65k IPs in the default set, you can add more lists).

  • Everything off gives me a score of only 3% blocked. Those 3% must be stuff so outrageous that they probably get blocked by upstream DNS servers.
  • Firefox ETP only, set to strict: 41%
  • Router adblock only: 69%
  • Firefox + router both on: 83%
  • uBlock Origin (alone or in combination): 97%
Rexios ,
@Rexios@lemm.ee avatar

I got a 100% on iOS using Wipr. Not sure that’s accurate if ublock origin didn’t even get a 100%…

Aethr ,

Must be a different statistic, I believe OPs stats are "percent of total traffic blocked" so 100% means your entire network would be blocked..

Quetzalcutlass ,

What list are you using on your router? I'm using Steven Black's list (which is just an amalgamation of a bunch of other lists) for my PiHole/uBlock filter list, and Firefox+uBlock Origin scored 99% (only failing the cosmetic static ad test).

StopSpazzing ,
@StopSpazzing@lemmy.world avatar

While easy to do, issue with doing this is you don't give active views to the lists that get combine so the owners of those lists are less inclined to update/maintain them. I would recommend if the list is useful to get each of the combine lists he uses and add them all separately.

lemmyvore ,

It's the Adblock package for OpenWRT. The default selection is
adaway, adguard, disconnect, yoyo, which is 3 x 10k lists and one 30k list.

I see that it has support for compiling Steve Black lists but SB can vary 50 - 500k and I only have a router with 128 MB RAM. I'll have to experiment with the "standard" SB list, see if it fits and if it makes any difference.

viking ,
@viking@infosec.pub avatar

Same. Not one interruption during the crackdown.

barsoap ,

I've noticed the occasional jump cut forwards in video where there should've been ads, just two or three seconds.

Bebo ,

Same. Didn't even get any youtube pop-ups regarding adblocker detection. Also no slowing down observed (as was reported in some articles a while back).

L_Acacia ,

Those slowndown article were clickbait / bad journalism , youtube hasn't been slowing down the site for adblock user.

rockSlayer ,

I got a pop up once, I cleared the ublock cache and never had any issues after.

eek2121 ,

I saw a popup once, refreshed and it was gone. 🤣

HarkMahlberg ,
@HarkMahlberg@kbin.social avatar

I moved from Vivaldi to Firefox during the crackdown, signed out all of my Google accounts, and immediately noticed the problems went away. Sorry Vivaldi...

Redjard ,
@Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I've just stumbled over Floorp, which to my understanding has many of Vivaldis features Firefox doesn't, like a sidebar, and is based on Firefox

BenVimes ,

I've gotten the pop-up once or twice, but updating uBlock fixed that.

I have instead noticed a large decrease in quality, things like frozen images/pages and endless buffering. I don't know if all that is related, but it did start around the time YouTube started cracking down on ad blockers.

parpol ,

Not only did I not uninstall my adblocker, I also switched to the Invidious front-end to avoid any anti-adblocking scripts, and I can also download videos now, and get no trackers at all.

lemmyvore ,

Same here, it made me finally add some extra blocking on my router.

Treczoks ,

So far, no ads on YouTube. The defenses hold!

autotldr Bot ,

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In late October, YouTube confirmed that it had “launched a global effort” to make users disable ad blockers on the site.

Like many other Google-owned services, YouTube has been making the bulk of its money by showing targeted ads that are embedded directly in the user-generated content.

and its cult status in the media-playing-and-streaming landscape, the escalation of the YouTube’s war against ad blockers drew a lot of media attention.

However, we needed time to make the necessary adjustments — not least because until YouTube expanded its test to a significant portion of its users, we had a very limited set of data to work with.

Note: For illustrative purposes, we have truncated the graph so the 8% drop in the number of users during the early stages of YouTube’s crackdown may appear more pronounced than it actually was

After an initial panic, users stopped deserting the AdGuard Ad Blocker extension for Chrome en masse.


The original article contains 979 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines