Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

BigDiction

@BigDiction@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

BigDiction ,

That’s not really Forbes serving the malvertising intentionally. If your site hooks into a programmatic advertising stack, the risk of malware exists.
This is from 2016, but it’s mostly true today. If a user is blocking ads and cookies and they disable their ad blocker on a specific site only, there’s little data to know about that user. So you get low $CPM on the bid which is mainly where the malicious ads win bids on actual quality sites.
That’s why most top sites are very strict on who can bid nowadays.

BigDiction ,

I don’t see how it could be enforced without this. If you are operating internationally, comply or block your service from regions you cannot legally operate in.

Personally I don’t think Lemmy should comply. It’s an ad free community service with zero PII obligation besides an email and whatever IP you choose to connect from. No one has to be on Lemmy for any common social obligations.

If you want to be forgotten then leave!

Ticketek ‘glitch’ appears to re-sell fan’s $659 ticket for Taylor Swift concert — “They said, ‘someone else has it, we don’t know who, we can’t check or track who has your ticket’” (au.news.yahoo.com)

Ticketek ‘glitch’ appears to re-sell fan’s $659 ticket for Taylor Swift concert — “They said, ‘someone else has it, we don’t know who, we can’t check or track who has your ticket’”::A Taylor Swift fan believed her VIP ticket was 'stolen' from her account by Ticketek after an apparent system 'glitch'.

BigDiction ,

Limited view tickets were $1500 a piece when TS came to Levi stadium. Bonkers

BigDiction ,

too real. I must do this at least once a month.

BigDiction ,

Imagining a returning user who previously consented. If non essential cookies changed since their last visit, that user needs to consent again. But in scenario, just auto opt them out?
I’m weirdly on the fence between this might be a reasonable block or a violation of GDPR for denying access to users who do not provide consent.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines
    •