Infiltrated_ad8271

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago (edited 4 months ago)

It remains to be seen, but you will probably make the switch without knowing or being able to tell the difference.

Eventually who knows, maybe "your" money will expire, can only be used on certain products, or whatever the real owners want.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

The study may help settle a long-standing debate about the existence of reliable sex differences in the brain.

How many studies on these lines must appear before this "debate" is overcome? It is even a truism! That we are a tabula rasa without sexual dimorphism is as absurd as biological determinism.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

This is what I hate most about the privacy community, too fanatical and purist to allow extremely useful optional features that would allow them to reach more people.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

You could go on without doing it. I would like to use signal to signal, but there are literally zero people interested in my environment :-(
Using signal just me would be much better than using whatsapp directly, and would reduce the data collected.

If signal suddenly stopped being mostly a geek desert and people could still talk to all their contacts, don't you think they would be much more willing to move? The more people, the more people interested in migrating, and the less data for meta.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

If the user base is signal's big draw, I'm afraid we're screwed with such a tiny one against those titans.

Signal users are far more likely to need to use whatsapp than the other way around, and migrating to signal is a huge loss with not very popular gains. I don't see how it could compete on a level playing field, but that's where the opportunity to eliminate signal's huge disadvantage comes in.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

If they were to recommend it, I'm sure there would be people who would end up breading it with salt.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

Do ISPs "offer" them on a non-optional basis?

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago (edited 4 months ago)

Edit: I'm going to rephrase this so as not to divert it on the misinterpretation of a particular case.

Librewolf doesn't check anything, it just applies patches automatically. That's why sometimes bugs happen, like corrupting the user profiles of all flatpak users a year ago; entirely the fault of librewolf for not updating a line of code, and not of any third party.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

Unfortunately doing so anonymously is not an option for many countries.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 4 months ago

I tested it with a 16GB model and barely got 1 token per second. I don't want to imagine what it would take if I used 16GB of swap instead, let alone 130GB.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

https://idm.net.au/blog/002646two-years-european-isp%E2%80%99s-data

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago (edited 5 months ago)

You can see that the use cases above (commentary, criticism, news reporting and scholarly reports) does not qualify LLM companies to use or train their models

Seems quite obvious that the text you quoted refers exclusively to plagiarism. This does not include things like being inspired by it, referencing it, parodying it and of course not training AI either, because what matters is whether the result is protected content.

You can argue that memorizing and sharing training data is a copyright violation, and that's a fair point, but it's also worth noting that this is very much a minority, accidental and is being addressed.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

The question is quickly answered as none is currently that good, open or not.

Anyway it seems that this is just a manager. I see some competitors available that I have heard good things about, like mistral.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

If (as it seems) the point is not impersonation but damage to the person's honor/image, where exactly is the line?

If realism is the determining factor, what about a hyperrealistic human work? And if it is under human interpretation how realistic it should be, could a sketch be included?

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

Expect parents to be minimally responsible? No way!

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

But that refers to personal data, and I suppose the state will be able to identify you and your habits if it gets the logs from the websites.
I wonder if the websites will get a unique identifier, that would allow them to track you so accurately it would make google horny.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

I read the article and did not see where the method is specified, have you even read it?

When implemented correctly

Aha. How bold to assume that they will limit themselves and apply privacy best practices.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

Okay, now I see which article you are referring to.
I know knowledge-zero, but we have different points, mine was not about the inability to do it but how the government will do it.

It would be very easy for them to justify that they have to identify pedos, I would be very surprised if they would guarantee privacy. But whatever, unfortunately I guess we'll find out.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

Receive it in an ad and keep it on your disk as a cache?

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 5 months ago

Firefox's cookie management is absolutely terrible and anachronistic, forget about automated granular control. It also has serious bugs like this one, it's better to use containers for any site where you want a whitelist.

There are some addons to help you manage it, but I think they are all flawed or broken.

Infiltrated_ad8271 , 7 months ago

In this case there are several crimes, but in the other one mentioned about a korean there is nothing, only possession of generated content arguing that there is high realism (someone could say the same even of a sketch). To imprison for acts that have neither victims nor any harm either directly or indirectly, is more aberrant than possessing that.

PS: I'm just talking about legality and rights, I know it's controversial and I'm sure someone has something to argue against it, but if you're going to accuse me of being a pedo just get lost you moron.