Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

TheEntity

@TheEntity@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

TheEntity ,

Subsidise how? They were using their existing plan as intended and even willing ditch the grey-area parts. If CF cannot afford to offer their plans as they are, they should change the offered plans, not hunt for easy prey.

TheEntity ,

Sadly that's very likely not what that person meant.

TheEntity ,

From the customer point of view, I don't see how paying for sex if I can't have it in another way is any more degrading than buying instant meals all the time because my hypothetical cooking skills barely allow me to boil my own water without injuring myself.

TheEntity ,

If the hard mode merely makes everything into a bullet sponge with huge HP bar, no thanks. I'm perfectly fine with some games just being easier and others just being harder. Or having multiple well thought out difficulty options, but only if they are actually well thought out.

TheEntity ,

I'm truly confused about what people expected.

TheEntity ,

I'd be perfectly okay with them just charging for Bitwarden, period. Instead they pretend it's free but charge premium for all the most effective security features, including 2FA to their own services. Effectively it creates a group of people that use Bitwarden without access to these security features but complacent enough to not seek alternatives that would offer these features at a price acceptable for them (possibly free, like KeepassXC).

Bottom line: security shouldn't be a premium feature. It should be either available or not at all. Never as a premium within the service.

TheEntity ,

I wasn't aware they added WebAuthn to the free plan recently. That's great to hear, thanks for the correction!

TheEntity ,

DNS-based ad blocking is unfortunately much less effective. It's still better than nothing though, that's for sure.

TheEntity ,

Presumably so it can work with either libc implementation.

TheEntity ,

They are the alolan forms.

TheEntity ,

Even if it's supported, it doesn't mean it needs to be installed in every system. If the user wants to use a Musl-based system, the software working only on glibc needs to be patched. At least that's how I understood these statements.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines