Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

curiousaur

@curiousaur@reddthat.com

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

curiousaur , (edited )

You ever raked an acre? Or three? Ten?

curiousaur ,

Seriously, why aren't we just using rail?

‘IRL Fakes:’ Where People Pay for AI-Generated Porn of Normal People (www.404media.co)

A Telegram user who advertises their services on Twitter will create an AI-generated pornographic image of anyone in the world for as little as $10 if users send them pictures of that person. Like many other Telegram communities and users producing nonconsensual AI-generated sexual images, this user creates fake nude images of...

curiousaur ,

You can get 300 tokens in pornx dot ai for $9.99. This guy is ripping people off.

curiousaur ,

With L4D3 and Team fortress 3, packaged together in the Orange Box 2.

curiousaur ,

Your second point here is exactly what we should fear; that it might becomes legal only for companies and governments to use AI but not the masses.

That's why I'm of the opinion that we should maybe just get over it. It's going to continue to become easier and easier to use it for horny reasons. The guy wearing the smart glasses might be seeing every women around him undressed in real time. We're just a few years away from that and there is no acceptable way to prevent that.

curiousaur ,

That's how this statement and the state of the industry feels. The ai tools are empowering senior engineers to be as productive as a small team, so even my company laid off all the junior engineers.

So who's coming up behind the senior engineers? Is the ai they use going to take the reigns when they retire? Nope, the companies will be fucked.

Sony misses PS5 sales target as console enters ‘latter stage of its life cycle’ (www.theverge.com)

Sony misses PS5 sales target as console enters ‘latter stage of its life cycle’::Sony has cut its sales forecast by 4 million units for the fiscal year, down from 25 million to 21 million. It comes as the company missed its sales projections by a million.

curiousaur ,

Why would anyone buy a PlayStation? All the games are making their way to PC now. Also the Xbox games. You can emulate the switch games.

curiousaur ,

Poorly optimized? They run better on PC than PlayStation. Horizon zero dawn and FF7 remake run beautifully on the steam deck. A handheld.

curiousaur ,

Yes, of course the steam deck doesn't outperform a PlayStation 5. I said the games perform excellently and look great on handheld. They are very well optimized on PC.

Taylor Swift deepfakes on X falsely depict her engaging in election denialism — and have been viewed millions of times (www.nbcnews.com)

Taylor Swift deepfakes on X falsely depict her engaging in election denialism — and have been viewed millions of times::Taylor Swift is being targeted again by deepfakes, with supporters of Donald Trump posting manipulated media falsely showing her supporting Trump.

curiousaur ,

Cats out of the bag. We need to get used to it because it's only getting worse.

curiousaur ,

Only if customers are willing to pay for it.

curiousaur ,

No, you're missing the point. Invest in housing.

curiousaur ,

Then open it? The problem with capitalism is that is has to be profitable to exist, so unfortunately the likely reason it doesn't exist is because it wouldn't be profitable. To have all those items, variations and services, it would end up being very expensive.

curiousaur ,

Because it burns you. That's the answer. It kills your skin cells and eyes the same way it kills the bacteria. Also, it is everywhere, it's fucking outside. The sun. Fucking stupid. Idiots.

Know what else kills bacteria? Bleach. So get chugging.

So stupid.

curiousaur ,

I hope you say jfeg the to be consistent, because that's how the p in photography is pronounced.

curiousaur ,

The issue is there really is no way to stop it unless you make ai illegal. The cat is already out of the bag. The models and hardware are getting better and faster and cheaper.

How do you suppose you enforce a law like this when people stop even sharing the photos they create, maybe don't even save them themselves, because it's so easy and instant to create more when you want to see them. "Put her face on her body in this position", bam, instant album of photos to jerk off to, then delete them. That's how good and how available these models are getting.

How do you think restrictions on this should, or could, be enforced?

curiousaur ,

When it's widely available, you could share a perfectly legal photo, along with the prompt. Then everyone who runs it would see similar generated images on their own devices, without distributing anything illegal.

I'm trying to point out how futile it is to fight this, and that any attempt to actually stop it will eventually lead to limits on the AI models themselves.

(Sorry didn't mean to reply twice, Lemmy things)

curiousaur ,

There isn't ways to limit certain models without limiting all AI tech, which is what the first comment above from another user was saying. That corporations want to be the only ones using it by keeping it out of the hands of regular people, and this plays into that.

Something this powerful should absolutely be democratized, we should all have our own open source models, and unfortunately that means those smart glasses the guy on the bus is wearing could be undressing everyone in real time.

There's nothing to be done about it, and trying to do something is worse. It's like the war on drugs. Folks who want to do it are gonna do it. Fighting it is only going to make the world worse. Unfortunately there are victims here, but societally I think we're just going to have to get over it.

curiousaur ,

If everyone could create their own, and just run it locally, explain how the laws could be enforced?

curiousaur ,

You conceded that no one cares if someone makes images locally then deletes them. But that's how they're all going to be made shortly.

Currently folks are sharing them because not everyone has the means to create them, some folks do, and share what they've made.

Once litterally every can just make them the moment they want to, no one will be sharing. Everyone will fall under that use case that you admitted no one would care about, which is exactly what I've been saying. It's 1. futile to try to stop, and 2. going to become so wide spread that we as a society will stop caring about it.

curiousaur ,

Like what? Why share something when anyone curious to see it can instantly generate their own?

curiousaur ,

I don't think you're properly understanding the paradigm shift that's coming with these models being open source and widely available while wearable AR smart glasses get better.

"You know Sharon is HR, look at this scandalous photo of her."

"Uh, I'm seeing a live generated porno of everyone in this room right now, why would I care about that."

curiousaur ,

It's probably a bit of an exaggeration, but my point stands. It's going to be so easy for anyone to see ai gen material of anyone else, no one is going to care anymore.

curiousaur ,

It's not illegal to to work on, sell, or distribute the models. And making that illegal is what the first commenter said would be dangerous to do, since then regular people wouldn't be able to compete with corporation's abilities.

Once the models and portable hardware are good enough, and it's just a matter of time, I think you're underestimating how ubiquitous it will become.

Every teenage boy will have a pair of nudie glasses in the form of their smartphone running open source models, and you think they're just going to not use them?

curiousaur ,

When it becomes one click to see the chick across from you naked, tell me how many 16 year old boys won't. You are far too naive to be having this conversation.

curiousaur ,

Governments should not be taking on parental duties.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines