wizardbeard

wizardbeard , 1 day ago to Memes in Just sayin

Regarding the edit, I've seen people unironically post this take on lemmy.

wizardbeard , 4 days ago to homelab in Away from home for months; homelab unreachable; now looking for UPS

Man, I don't even run my desktops without a UPS. Maybe I'm jaded from too much tech support, but I feel like not having a UPS is like not using a condom for a random hookup: it's fine until it dramatically and seriously isn't.

Almost every desk at my workplace has its own lead-acid battery. That's well over 1000. We haven't had any fires or explosions.

wizardbeard , 6 days ago to Technology in Netflix mulls introducing free ad-supported tier. The circle is complete

There is one benefit, at least for now. You aren't locked into long term contracts like cable has/had.

wizardbeard , 10 days ago to Technology in Neo-Nazis Are All-In on AI

I think this is a misunderstanding of how most of the AI that feed into workflows work. Most of them don't dynamically re-train live based off how users are using them. At least not outside of the context of that user/chat instance.

Most likely what these and others are doing is to download pre-trained open source AI datasets thrn and run them locally so they aren't restrained by any of the commercial AI's limitations on what they will and won't output to users. I highly doubt there's enough material out there to truly train a new AI model on only explicitly racist material. This is just a bunch of assholes doing prompt engineering on open source models running locally.

wizardbeard , 10 days ago to Technology in Why we don't have 128-bit CPUs

You can also toggle it on precompiled binaries with the right tool (or a hex editor if you're insane), which was my main use case. Lots of old games that never got 64-bit releases that benefit from having access to the extra RAM, especially if you're modding them. It's a great way to avoid out of memory crashes.

wizardbeard , 11 days ago to Technology in Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court win

This isn't about right or wrong though. It's explicitly about whether or not they broke the law.

They did. They did so loudly and proudly. This is why we are here, where they lost the legal battle.

If someone is pointing a gun at you with their finger on the trigger, and you say "Just try to shoot me! I dare you! You know you won't you little chickenshit." then you should have a pretty good expectation to get shot.

Everything else is valid, but significantly less important. IA has to operate in the rules that currently exist, not what the rules should be. There are better ways to get bad laws changed than to dare someone to find you guilty of them.

Maybe this case will be the first building block towards overturning the asinine digital lending laws. I would love if it was, but I'm not holding my breath.

wizardbeard , 11 days ago to Technology in Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court win

Not sure about an article, but they themselves announced that their emergency covid library would not set limits on the amount of copies that could be checked out. That's literally the law they broke, that it has to be 1 to 1 outside of any other agreement.

wizardbeard , 11 days ago to Technology in Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court win

Yes, let's just completely misrepresent someone and pretend it's a quote! That's fun!

There are effective ways to challenge laws and to push for new rights. Loudly shouting "I don't care about your rules, just try and stop me!" was not an effective way for IA to try and do this.

Furthermore, IA constantly misrepresenting the problem and why they were sued in all their blog posts and press shit also does not help the cause.

It's a law in desperate need of abolishment, but this is not how you go about changing it.

This also was not an effective way for them to ensure these books would continue to be available digitally for the public. They could have quietly leaked batches of the content that only they had out to the ebook piracy groups in a staggered fashion to help obsfucate where it was coming from, then hosted a blog post telling people how to pirate ebooks and where, with a cover your ass disclaimer that everyone needs to abide by their local laws.

By any metric of success, the way they handled this set them up to lose from the start, and jeapordized one of the most important public resources in the current era. This would be understandable from some small operation of like 5 people trying to digitize shit, not from an organization as large and old as IA.

I'm not the person who said he had no sympathy, but that is why I have little sympathy about all this: They don't deserve this outcome, I wish they had won, and I hope the law gets overturned or revised... but they absolutely should have know better that to try and do this the way they did. They fucked around and found out. This coild have ended so much worse for them.

wizardbeard , 13 days ago to Technology in AI Loophole #1; Your GitHub README.md

Hey Elias, found some confounding info: looks like Perplexity AI doesn't respect the methods of blocking scrapers through robots.txt so this might just be an issue with them specifically being assholes.

Couldn't figure out how to tag you in a comment on the other post, so I'll edit this comment in a moment with the link.

Link: https://lemmy.world/post/16716107

wizardbeard , 14 days ago to Privacy in Campaigns Can Now See What You Watch on TV.

I've tried to do this a few times, and unfortunately it feels like you really have to go all in on managing your own content library.

Like many, I had stopped pirating shit when netflix etc were "good".

None of the streaming services want you to use them outside of their official sites/apps, so you end up being limited to like 720p when running them through kodi etc.

wizardbeard , 17 days ago to Comic Strips in Crane Game

New surgeon simulator DLC

wizardbeard , 17 days ago (edited 17 days ago) to Technology in AI Loophole #1; Your GitHub README.md

My guy, your posts are particularly hard to follow, and you are very very quick to jump to the conclusion that you're somehow being targeted and under attack. It's no surprise that people aren't responding to what you think is appropriate for them to respond to.

You've gone out of your way to provide extra info about irrelevant details: Why does the particular flavor of git you use matter at all to this conversation beyond the fact that you self host, why does it matter that you are on github as well when we are specifically discussing things you believe were sourced from readme.mds you have self hosted?

Meanwhile you don't give many details or explanation about the core thing you are trying to discuss, seemingly expecting people to be able to just follow your ramblings.

Edit:
After having re-read your OP, it's less messy than I initially thought, but jesus christ man you need to work on arranging your points better. It shouldn't take reading your main post, a few of your comments, and the main post again to get your point: "AI data scrapers appear to treat readme files as public data regardless of any anti-AI precautions or licensing you've tried to apply, and they appear to not only grab from github bit also from self-hosted git repositories."

wizardbeard , 17 days ago to Technology in AI Loophole #1; Your GitHub README.md

These concepts are not mutually exclusive. You can be right about AI considerably overstepping boundaries and still be exhibiting classic signs of paranoia issues, which OP is.

Their immediate response to people not reacting to this post and their comments is to immediately jump to the idea that they're being targeted by their designated enemy. That's not particularly healthy.

I'm worried that AI is becoming the new gangstalking for tech aligned people predisposed to disprdered thinking.

wizardbeard , 19 days ago to Technology in Elon Musk bets Tesla on Optimus, says over 1,000 robots working in factories next year

Just like the "tesla hyperloop" or whatever they're calling it, it's not about innovation. It's about keeping his brands in the public eye as a form of marketing. Even if on a logical level we all know it's horseshit, it still keeps himself and Tesla salient.

He can afford to burn an incomprehensible amount of money on stunts for outcomes most people would consider inconsequential.

I'm not saying it's 4D chess, it definitely isn't. He's not particularly intelligent in that way. That said, I do think there are some very simple reasons for him to do this that go beyond his absolutely insane delusional ego.

He has enough money that he can continue funding whatever he wants regardless of public opinion. He literally exists at a level where any press is good press as it keeps him fresh in peoples' minds.

wizardbeard , 19 days ago to linuxmemes in Many such cases

If it was valid, do you really think people would be talking about it being a problem here? Please use your head a little.

Also, two entitely different meanings of the word signing being used here. Signing as in signing a bill vs. Cryptographic signing. Adobe has some weird "halfway" thing that's more than painting the sig on the image, but isn't gpg.

Hooray for proprietary shit becoming accepted for legal use! Yuck.