Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

PhreakyByNature ,

NEEDS MOAR 69 FELLOW HUMAN

Semi-Hemi-Demigod ,
@Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

So what? It figured out The Answer, big whoop.

Get back to me when it figures out The Question.

lolola ,
@lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

What's the y axis?

kciwsnurb ,

The temperature scale, I think. You divide the logit output by the temperature before feeding it to the softmax function. Larger (resp. smaller) temperature results in a higher (resp. lower) entropy distribution.

ArmoredThirteen ,

I don't understand any of these words, I need to take a math class or something

humbletightband ,

Higher temperature -> more chaotic output

lolola ,
@lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I still don't understand.

Midnitte ,

More yellow more common, more blue less common

kciwsnurb ,

Each row in the figure is a probability distribution over possible outputs (x-axis labels). The more yellow, the more likely (see the colour map on the right). With a small temperature (e.g., last row), all the probability mass is on 42. This is a low entropy distribution because if you sample from it you’ll constantly get 42, so no randomness whatsoever (think entropy as a measure of randomness/chaos). As temperature increases (rows closer to the first/topmost one), 42 is still the most likely output, but the probability mass gets dispersed to other possible outputs too (other outputs get a bit more yellow), resulting in higher entropy distributions. Sampling from such distribution gives you more random outputs (42 would still be frequent, but you’d get 37 or others too occasionally). Hopefully this is clearer.

Someone in another reply uses the word “creativity” to describe the effect of temperature scaling. The more commonly used term in the literature is “diversity”.

TheOctonaut ,

Temperature is basically how creative you want the AI to be. The lower the temperature, the more predictable (and repeatable) the response.

lolola ,
@lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Creativity is hot. That makes more sense, thanks.

phorq ,

I petition to rename ChatGPT to DeepThought based on these results.

Blackmist ,

I spent an afternoon once playing Infinite Craft, which uses some sort of LLM behind the scenes to do it's combinations.

At one point I got 007, and found 007+007 = 0014.

The maths gets wild though, and because it's been trained on text, it has no idea when it comes to combinations of numbers it hasn't seen before. I spent ages trying to get it to 69420 and just couldn't, although I could get 42069.

Kyre ,

Well.... I was not aware Chatgpt could make simple graphs.

OmnipotentEntity ,
@OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org avatar

A human made the graph

Kyre ,

I know but I was curious to see what it would do and was surprised that it produced a plot for me. Not sure why I'm surprised at this point.

kbal ,
@kbal@fedia.io avatar

Obviously the bots do not share in our human fondness for the number 69.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • technology@beehaw.org
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines