Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

BrikoX ,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

They were supporting them until Houthis attacks interfered with their supplies, and then they vetoed the ceasefire resolution since it was US proposed. Politics before lives.

yogthos OP ,
@yogthos@lemmy.ml avatar

What US proposed was not an actual ceasefire. US was the one to repeatedly veto actual ceasefire resolutions.

BrikoX ,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

Please read the actual resolution before commenting. It explicitly said "immediate and sustained ceasefire". The only difference between the two is one condemned the Hamas attack and another didn't. And yes, US are the worst in all of this, not only they vetoed previous attempts, but also financed all the killings. But if you can't see the politics behind Russia's and China's veto, you are blind.

Alsephina ,

That "resolution" only ordered Hamas to turn over the hostages so they would have less options, and instead greenlighted an invasion of Rafah by the zionist military.

Russia and China voted for the subsequent resolution drafted by the elected members of the UNSC that ordered an actual ceasefire (which israel has clearly not obeyed however; unenforceable resolutions are meaningless as it turns out).

BrikoX ,
@BrikoX@lemmy.zip avatar

Please read the actual resolutions before commenting. Both of them order Hamas to release the hostages. And nowhere in the resolution it green lits the attack on Rafah. Though, interestingly, that's the exact reason Russia stated for their objection.

And yes, Israel is committing a genocide, so no surpsire they are not complying...

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • worldnews@lemmy.ml
  • All magazines