AIhasUse

AIhasUse , 4 days ago to Lefty Memes in Self-Regulation

You will be much better off if you listen to my point and don't try to imagine you know everything. There really, truly is nothing wrong with considering other points of view. There is also nothing wrong with people asking questions. You don't need the safety and constant agreement that you think you do.

AIhasUse , 4 days ago to Lefty Memes in Self-Regulation

No, you don't know that. You just assume you know that. You've been so brainwashed that you think anyone who doesn't already know everything you know and have every opinion you have is evil and out to get you. It is OK to learn, it is OK to change your mind, and it is OK to ask questions. The most important thing is not always hearing that you are right.

AIhasUse , 4 days ago (edited 4 days ago) to Lefty Memes in Self-Regulation

To all the people out there that hate questions so much and downvote people who ask them: What happened to you that made you so angry about people wanting to acquire information?

To all the informative people who answer questions, thank you!

AIhasUse , 4 days ago to Lefty Memes in Self-Regulation

What is an example of something that is not self-regulated that was worked out well?

Is the pharmaceutical industry self-regulated?

AIhasUse , 8 days ago to Memes in hip boi reppin that style from when he was 2

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/48d122ca-f5a3-4614-b12a-fbea49794c57.jpeg

AIhasUse , 10 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

Other than having to scroll down an extra 3 centimeters to see your Google results, have you actually been inconvenienced by ai being used somewhere? All this outrageous about terrible ai getting in the way all the time is hilarious because it is absolutely manufactured by people who are obsessed with complaining and then parroted by people incapable of thinking for themselves. Nobody's actually living worse lives because a few companies are trying out new tech. The fact of the matter is that there are obnoxious karens online, just like in real life.

You seem like someone who is probably self-righteous, obnoxious, and annoying to be around in real life, just like you are online.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

Because the headline goes along with all the people that thoughtlessly think ai is pointless, but the blog post itself is an incoherent mess that actually sometimes talks about how ai is useful and rapidly improving. It is a rambling mess. People who read it realise this. People who just read the headline assume it will say what they think. The chances that you made it through that whole thing are slim to none, but sure, maybe you read it, whatever. Congratulations, I'm sure it really improved your understanding.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

What a good full set of possibilities since it's certainly impossible for anyone on the internet to lie. How fun for a blog to contradict its main point.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

Yeah, this is exactly what I think it is. I'm a bit concerned about how hard it's going to hit a large number of people when they realize that they're echo chamber of "LLMs are garbage and have no benefits" was so completely wrong. I agree that there are scary aspects of all this, but pretending like they don't exist will just make it harder to deal with. It's like denying that the smoke alarm is going off until your arm is on fire.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

There is literally not a chance that anyone downvoting this actually read it. It's just a bunch of idiots that read the title, like the idea that llms suck and so they downvoted. This paper is absolute nonsense that doesn't even attempt to make a point. I seriously think it is ppprly ai generated and just taking the piss out of idiots that love anything they think is anti-ai, whatever that means.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in EU chat control law proposes scanning your messages — even encrypted ones

This is that super forward-thinking EU tech protection we are always hearing about that the whole world should be so jealous of.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

It blatantly contradicts itself. I would wager good money that you read the headline and didn't go much further because you assumed it was agreeing with you. Despite the subject matter, this is objectively horribly written. It lacks a cohesive narrative.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

Yes, and then you take the time to dig a little deeper and use something agent based like aider or crewai or autogen. It is amazing how many people are stuck in the mindset of "if the simplest tools from over a year aren't very good, then there's no way there are any good tools now."

It's like seeing the original Planet of the Apes and then arguing against how realistic the Apes are in the new movies without ever seeing them. Sure, you can convince people who really want unrealistic Apes to be the reality, and people who only saw the original, but you'll do nothing for anyone who actually saw the new movies.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

Yeah, this paper is time wasted. It is hilarious that they think that 3 years is a long time as a data scientists and this somehow gives them such wisdom. Then, they can't even accurately extract the data from the chart that they posted in the article. On top of all this, like you pointed out, they can't even keep a clear narrative, and they blatantly contradict themself on their main point. They want to pile drive people who come to the same conclusion as themself. What a strange take.

AIhasUse , 15 days ago to Technology in I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity

I don't know how much stock to put in this author. They can't even read the chart that they shared. They saw that 8% didn't get use from gen ai and so assumed that 92% did. There are also 7% that haven't tried using it yet. Ironically, pretty much any LLM with vision would have done a better job of comprehending the chart than this author did.