EleventhHour , 3 days ago

Someone should redub that movie with all of the answers provided by ChatGPT and its voice

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

Get ready for the great memes on social media for the next month or so.

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

Hope you’re doing well! Best wishes!

American healthcare sucks unless you’re rich

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

I was gonna say… disgruntled people on the internet have been around probably since before OP was born… the grievances and bitching unleashed on Usenet and IRC back in the day could be legendary. ESP on IRC, where users and entire servers would go to war with each other.

The Internet is pretty incredible now, but it used to be a hell of a lot more fun

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

This month…

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

❤️

Best wishes to you!

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

I didn’t mean to come off as dismissive regarding your situation, simply to say that this isn’t a new phenomenon on the Internet.

I apologize for any offense caused

I’m very sorry to hear about your health problems, and I only wish you the best.

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

Oh my goodness that sucks

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

I probably would be too, in your situation.

❤️

EleventhHour , 5 days ago

Regular code review for security should be SOP

EleventhHour , 11 days ago

Retro gaming?

EleventhHour , 13 days ago

What… like, more?

EleventhHour , 13 days ago

“We’re not even gonna try, and here is our lame, bullshit excuse. Fuck off.”

EleventhHour , 16 days ago

"oops," said MS accounting dept

EleventhHour , 19 days ago

Content creators get nothing from a subscription To YouTube premium.

You’re not paying for the content, you’re paying for and-free access to the content.

EleventhHour , 19 days ago

I don’t care. I don’t wanna watch ads, ever. The point is, YouTube will never be able to stop ad blockers. They can try, and the only ones who get hurt on the content creators.

Edit: and whining, “boo-hoo for the trillion dollar megacorp!” Isn’t going to elicit any sympathies

EleventhHour OP , 19 days ago

lol, oops!

fixed!

EleventhHour OP , 19 days ago

This seems to work, even on my 14 Pro.

EleventhHour OP , 7 days ago

I’m a little off-put by how aggressive you’re being, but let’s consider what you’ve said:

Siri pulls from a small library of canned stories.

I’d appreciate a citation. Although, since this seems weird to prove without an official statement AND because Apple might just try this— I’ll consider a preponderance of evidence in lieu of some academic (or journalistic) study in the matter. It had better be good.

I also am very much aware of 2 important things re: your argument:

1. I am able to produce the stories from Siri prompts on my iPhone 14 Pro (running iOS 18 DB1), a device that has been listed, even before the iOS 18 announcement, as not being able to support any of the AI features.
2. I never summoned a “bedtime story” before, but I find them eminently amusing. I still think that weird and good ones should be posted here. I will adjust the requirements for the Community accordingly.
3. Even if you are correct in everything you said, the point of this community is for people who enjoy these stories to share them and enjoy them. Regardless of a few technical inaccuracies on my part, Don don’t yuck our Yum. Thx

PS: if you wish to (and for those also reading this) — I encourage everyone to share your weird and funny generated stories anyway. If Apple intelligence is able to make these stories better in the future, all the better. Please share those as well!

EleventhHour OP , 7 days ago

I’m not sure what to tell you other than: don’t yuk other peoples’ yum.

If you don’t like it, move on. That just means this place isn’t for you. It does not mean that it’s for you to judge.

EleventhHour , 22 days ago

Shoutout to !tenforward 🖖🏻

EleventhHour , 25 days ago

I don’t understand this… How do you code if you don’t know where you’re coding for? Am I the only one that thinks that sounds crazy?

EleventhHour , 26 days ago (edited 26 days ago)

Well, this just screams: “I want to fuck kids! WHY WONT YOU LET ME FUCK KIDS!”

You may wanna twist a word in order to rationalize it, but it’s still fucking disgusting and wrong, because you’re ignoring the sexual power dynamics between the two people and how the younger person can easily been manipulated by the older person, because younger person simply is too young to understand them and will easily fall victim to the older person.

gross

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/78815bf7-2c0e-48f2-b311-8c9b06d737a2.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

But 18 and 19 year olds are not kids you idiot they are both legally considered an adult in most parts of the world

But you’re still ignoring the huge difference in power dynamic. Unless you want that, in which case I can’t see how you could call that moral.

Obviously I would never have sex with 16 and 17 year old woman because they both considered minors which makes it morally wrong for me to have sex with them because I'm an adult.

Since you still struggle with the morality of the sexual power dynamics of having sexual relationships with those too young to understand the concept, it’s clear that it’s not any sense of morality stopping you— it’s the legality.

I have no doubt you’d fuck kids if you didn’t fear the legal consequences.

So the question remains: why do you wanna fuck kids so bad, and why do you think fucking kids is moral?

EleventhHour , 26 days ago (edited 26 days ago)

No, you’re talking About ephobephilia, which is fucking kids. It’s even in the title of your post and in the comment of your post if you weren’t talking about fucking kids, you wouldn’t have mentioned it.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/37c8f3d3-ed57-4ffa-934f-a9e61c3ae3a1.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago (edited 26 days ago)

Why do you want to fuck kids so bad? Why are you so determined to convince everyone that fucking kids is “moral” unless that’s what you want to do?

Ephebophilia is NOT, by definition, adults having sex with adults.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

lol, the APA is certainly a more credible source than Wikipedia, and you’re just cherry-picking a definition that doesn’t make you sound like a kiddie-fucker.

I only want to be in casual sexual relationship with 18 and 19 year old woman because 18 and 19 year old woman are both adults and they're hot as fuck.

That’s obviously not true, for if it were, you wouldn’t be trying so hard to convince everyone here that it’s ok to fuck kids.

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

I believe any adult that has sex with minors is immoral.

Then why do you keep trying to convince everyone here of the opposite?

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/d57e1b87-241c-4a43-8f32-8e2bfd26299c.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

After everything you’ve said, I don’t believe that you wouldn’t fuck a kid, and that it’s only fear of legal consequences that stops you. For now.

Kiddie fucker.

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

Again I have always said that ephebophilia between two consenting adults

you're not entitled to your own facts.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

cherry-picking a different definition from google just because you want to engage in rationalizing fucking children doesn't magically make it acceptable or "moral". you're just engaging in mental gymnastics to make what you're doing sound like you don't want to fuck kids, when everything else you describe is you wanting to fuck children.

get help

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

only regarding the specific rage of ages of the kids you want to fuck: adolescent vs preadolescent children.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

I believe it’s morally wrong for adults to have sex with minors.

no you don't

Ephebophiles are not immoral

yet...

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

Cherry picking

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.

just because you found some definition from google that says you're not a kiddie fucker doesn't mean you're not a kiddie fucker. The APA is a far more credible source than some random wiki-- you just lash out because you don't want to admit you're a kiddie fucker and that fucking kids is disgusting and wrong.

STOP FUCKING KIDS, KIDDIE FUCKER!

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

Straw man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

I said ephebophilia between two consenting adults

but your post title is

Ephebophiles are not immoral

ephebophelia cannot exist between adults because

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.

this argument is flawed because

ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/78815bf7-2c0e-48f2-b311-8c9b06d737a2.jpeg

So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?

first, i don't believe you're interested in that, or you wouldn't be here trying to convince everyone it's ok to fuck kids. but, also:

Straw man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

The definition that you give is wrong you idiot.

just because you don't like it doesn't make it wrong. if you have a more credible source than the American Psychological Association, i'd like to see it. so far, you've just cherry-picked some rando definition that doesn't make you look like the kiddie fucker you are,.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

for, like, the fifth time...

first, i don't believe you're interested in that, or you wouldn't be here trying to convince everyone it's ok to fuck kids. but, also:

Straw man

A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".

ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/78815bf7-2c0e-48f2-b311-8c9b06d737a2.jpeg

the definition doesn't change just because you don't want to be one

stop fucking kids, kiddie-fucker

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

Here is more credit source

according to who? you, a kiddie fucker?

lmao psychology today is a casual-reading magazine for civilians, not a professional resource, like a psychology dictionary from a professional organization.

just more

Cherry-picking

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.[2]

stop fucking kids, kiddie fucker

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cccefe46-d42a-4a3d-9bac-009eb681bf2b.jpeg

here's another:

https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199534067.001.0001/acref-9780199534067-e-9328

Sexual attraction to adolescents, sometimes classified as a paraphilia.

EleventhHour , 26 days ago

could it be, because, according to this post of yours, you're a kiddie-fucker?

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/78815bf7-2c0e-48f2-b311-8c9b06d737a2.jpeg