IsoKiero

IsoKiero , 6 days ago

I've used Seafile for years just for this. I haven't ran that on pi, but on virtual machine it runs pretty smoothly and android client is pretty hassle free.

IsoKiero , 2 months ago

Think a large office space or industrial application with several hundred (or thousands) of hosts connected to the network. Some of them need to be isolated from the internet and/or rest of the network, some need only access to the internet, some need internet and local services and so on.

With that kind of setup you could just run separate cables and unmanaged switches for every different type of network you have and have the router manage where each of those can talk to. However, that would be pretty difficult to change or expand while being pretty expensive as you need a ton of hardware and cabling to do it. Instead you use VLANs which kinda-sorta split your single hardware switch into multiple virtual ones and you can still manage their access from a single router.

If you replace all the switches with routers they're quite a bit more expensive and there's not too many routers with 24 or 48 ports around. And additonally router configuration is more complex than just telling the switch that 'ports 1-10 are on vlan id 5 and ports 15-20 are on id 8'. With dozens of switches that adds up pretty fast. And while you could run most routers as a switch you'll just waste your money with that.

VLANs can be pretty useful in home environment too, but they're mostly used in bigger environments.

IsoKiero , 3 months ago

I don't know about homeassistant, but there's plenty of open source software to interact with odb2 at least for linux. With some tinkering it should be possible to have bluetooth enabled odb2 adapter where you can dump even raw data out and feed it to some other system of your choise, homeassistant included.

If you want live data from the drive itself you of course need to have some kind of recording device with you (raspberry pi comes to mind) but if you're happy just to log whatever is available when parking the car you could set up a computer with bluetooth nearby the parking spot on your yard and pull data from that. It may require that you keep the car powered on for a while after arrival to keep bus active, but some cars give at least some data via odb even when without the key being in ignition lock.

IsoKiero , 4 months ago

Most, but not all, do. So it might be as simple as setting a static address, or it may overlap in the future.

You could ask from ISP (or try it out yourself) if you can use some addresses outside of DHCP pool, my ISP router had /24 subnet with .0.1 as gateway but DHCP pool started from .0.101 so there would've been plenty of addresses to use. Mine had a 'end user' account too from wehere I could've changed LAN IP's, SSID and other basic stuff, but I replaced the whole thing with my own.

IsoKiero , 4 months ago

If I remember correctly, 1000Base-T standard has a requirement that device has to negotiate pinout on the fly. No matter which pin is connected to which. Obvioiusly just randomly wiring a cable up has other problems, like signal-to-noise, but in theory it should work even if you make a cable that's as unstandard as you can make it.

IsoKiero , 4 months ago

I’d first recommend that you think about what you need.

This is the absolutely correct option. I've set up way too many things without a use case and lost interest shortly after. If you have a real world use case for your project, even if it's just for yourself, you'll have the incentive to keep it going. If you're just setting things up for the sake of it the hobby loses it's appeal pretty quickly. Of course you'll learn a thing or two on the way but without a real world use case the things you set up will either become a burden to keep up with or they're eventually just deleted.

Personally, tinkering with things that are just removed after a while gave me skills which landed me on my current job, but it's affected myself enough that I don't enjoy setting things up just for the sake of it anymore. Of course time plays a part on this, I've been doing this long enough that when I started a basic LAMP server was a pretty neat thing to have around, so take this with a grain of oldtimer salt, but my experience is that setting up things that are actually useful on a long term is way more rewarding than spinning up something which gets deleted in a month and it'll keep the spark going on for much longer.

IsoKiero , 4 months ago

Seafile. I've used it for years, but I'm moving over to nextcloud as I could use other features it provides. They have paid options too, but unless you need LDAP or something more sophisticated for user management the community edition works just fine.

IsoKiero , 5 months ago

I personally like mikrotik routers. They have all the features you could wish for and then some and they're relatively cheap for the things they can do. I have RB4011iGS+ (I don't think that exaxt model is available anymore) and it's been rock solid. As I have fiber I just pulled the SPF-module from ISP's box and plugged it in on my own hardware, so the router ISP provided is just gathering dust right now.

But it depends on what you're really after. If you just need basic firewall/NAT/DHCP functionality and your connection speed is below 1Gbit pretty much any router will do. If you have fast connection and/or need for totally separate networks/VLAN/something else it's a whole another matter.

IsoKiero , 5 months ago

have seen some people have networking issues with them.

I've been a happy customer for hetzner for almost a decade and I haven't had any issues with their networking. If you're running virtualization you need to take care of you MAC addresses or they won't allow traffic and eventually will kick you off from their platform (and they have a good reason to do so). As long as you play by their rules on their hardware it's rock solid, specially for the price.

IsoKiero , 9 months ago

I ran one for a while. In Finland legislation is a bit different, so I wasn't worried about breaking the law or getting sued, but my ISP got in touch pretty quickly. They were professionals and understood the situation when I explained why my traffic might look "a bit" suspicious and I attempted to clean up bad actors from the traffic with filtering and whatnot, but eventually ISP got enough complaints and they were pretty much forced to tell me that either I shut the exit node down or they'll cut my line.

As I said, they were very professional about it, and managed the whole experiment as good as I ever could have hoped, but my agreement with them has an option that if I'm letting malware and bad actors leave the network even after warnings they can shut the connection down. And that's understandable, I suppose they have similar agreements with other providers and they received all the abuse mail my exit node was causing, so I'm still a happy customer with them even if they eventually took the hard way.

I'm still pretty sure it would be possible to run filtered exit node, but it would require far more time and other resources that I'm willing to spend on a project like that and I'm not sure if a single person is enough for it anyways.

So, yes, do your homework and be careful. Legislation plays a significant part (depending on where you live), but your ISP most likely won't like it either.

IsoKiero , 11 months ago

I did that for a while to try and learn about filtering malicious traffic from the network. Doing that long term would definetly change my life, but very much not in a good way. It's a endless whack-a-mole game and the winning prize is that your ISP doesn't give you a call weekly.

It took couple of weeks until the ISP first called and told me that I have malicious traffic coming from my IP. I explained the situation and their representative was very understanding and handled the thing as well as he ever could. I tried to adjust filters, blocklists and all the jazz which was pretty much a full time job already and I still couldn't make it work on a sufficient level. I got another couple of calls from ISP (again, handled spectaculary considering I was pushing several hundreds Mbps dirty traffic out in the wild) and eventually they just plainly said that they're forced to kill my connection if situation doesn't improve. I ran a node without exit for a while but as that's not a interesting thing to run I eventually shut it down to free resources for more interesting things.

If you have the time and knowledege to do that, I really encourage that, but for me it was too much to keep in the network while trying to maintain some sanity on my everyday life. I firmly believe that my goal of filtering malicious traffic out and keeping an exit node runnig is achievable goal, I just don't have enough knowledge nor time to gain enough of it to keep exit node running.

And of course there's legal issues as well and severity of them heavily depends on where you're living, so really do your homework before doing anything like that.