Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

MostlyBlindGamer

@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com

Opinions are my own. Profile picture description: Black on white pictogram with a D20 showing 20 for a head and a game controller for a body and arms, holding a white cane.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

Or “How Signal is closer in functionality to WhatsApp by the day, because it turns out people like the functionality of WhatsApp.”

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

If I’m reading this correctly, they’re adding your name to your site profile, but that’s not visible and is not linked to your reviews.

That specificity makes the situation much less terrifying than the title alone would imply.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

I’m looking at it from a perspective of intentionality. Careless? Definitely. A risk ? For sure. But the situation is still not as the title implies.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

Risks that are already described.

The headline does it’s job getting clicks by making it sound like reviewers names may already be public.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

I was thinking about how this would happen and I remembered when signing up for services using Google login, I’d always get a list of information the website would have access to, including the name listed under the Google account. When I didn’t consent to that, I went back.

Now, is there a line somewhere between strictly getting a user’s consent and the user having an expectation of privacy? Yes, and they may have landed on the wrong side of it.

Suffice it to say, this is one of the reasons I prefer to sign up with an email address.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

Presumably you’re a UK citizen using .uk in accordance with the controlling entity’s terms and conditions. These folks weren’t in the same boat.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

How are you liking the Brexit expansion? I felt like was overhyped and overrated.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

Some other Central and Eastern European ones are weird as well.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

With this headset’s personalized design, it would probably be uncomfortable for a lot of people to wear one that wasn’t made for them. I’m sure Apple never considered what a shame it would be for each person to have to buy their own…

Either way, other headsets would likely be better for these retail style use cases.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

Something something monopoly, something something gatekeepers. They don’t need a war chest big enough to sue Apple, they just need to convince the EU to do it.
I’m sure they saw this coming from the start.

MostlyBlindGamer ,
@MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com avatar

You were absolutely right! It’s been a while, huh? WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger are gatekeepers and WhatsApp is supposed to open up based on the Signal Protocol. I guess we’re settling on that.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines