Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

eutampieri

@eutampieri@feddit.it

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

eutampieri ,

https://www.homeautomationguy.io/blog/network-zigbee-adapters-with-zigbee2mqtt

eutampieri ,

Cool! Perhaps you want to censor all photos :)

eutampieri ,

Also, SAS -> Serial Attached SCSI

Share your favorite automations

I've been running HA for a while, and it's been working well; I haven't had to change much in a few months. That being said, it's fun to tinker with it, and I'm curious to hear what kind of automations the rest of the community is using. What automations are you most proud of? What are your favorite? What kind of interesting...

eutampieri ,

I use the IPP integration for that

eutampieri ,

☺️

eutampieri ,

These are routed networks, and you need avahi reflector set up to mirror between A and PtP and between B and PtP

eutampieri ,

Then I don’t understand your topology.
However, I still think you need the reflector on both routers

eutampieri ,

This works if B has an interface that is connected to the A subnet, but not if you have a PtP between the two routers

eutampieri ,

No, with PtP I meant a point to point link on a dedicated interface just for the two routers.
https://image2.slideserve.com/5192070/point-to-point-sub-interfaces-l.jpg

eutampieri , (edited )

No, not at all 🙂. I'm referring to a configuration in which the two routers are linked through another subnet (using a separate link between the two) and this link is the point to point link. You usually assign a /30 so you can have an address for each router.
This way the traceroute shows three hops instead of just two.
However, since you’ve already told us that this is not your setup, what I’m saying shouldn’t matter to you. If you’re curious though, let’s keep talking :)

Edit: striked mistake

eutampieri ,

Traceroute from device in subnet A to device in subnet B

  • Router A
  • Router B
  • Device B

Note that the only way to do that in only two hops is to have the same router handle both subnets, contrary to what I said earlier.

eutampieri ,

Hmmm it seems that router B there should be a bridge. However, how comfortable are you with routing in general?

eutampieri ,

Exactly that.
Router A

ip address add 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth1
ip address add 10.0.0.1/30 dev eth2
ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.0.0.2

Router B

ip address add 192.168.2.1/24 dev eth1
ip address add 10.0.0.2/30 dev eth2
ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 10.0.0.1

Does this make it more clear?

eutampieri ,

I definitely agree!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines
    •