random_character_a

random_character_a , 3 days ago

It'll be opt-in, till it isn't.

random_character_a , 1 day ago

Musk knows something unrelated that's gonna bring down Teslas stock and this is how he's gonna exploit it?

random_character_a , 5 days ago

This is what the world is now. TL:DR, must react.

random_character_a , 11 days ago

So the term "old wives' tale" is still holds up?

random_character_a , 14 days ago

Zombie signal not strong enough to make people think Elon is excentric genius and not an loud moron?

random_character_a , 14 days ago

Well, that sounds like a one helluva bloatware

random_character_a , 24 days ago

Yes, but the original is better for us who have just barely scatched python or bash scripting at some point.

random_character_a , 1 month ago

How about saying Chinese cars contain monosodium glutamate and it's very bad for you.

random_character_a , 2 months ago

Sacrifice yourselfers for the eternal future Emperor God Elontron Musk.

He will insert his X in all of our hearts.

random_character_a , 3 months ago

Wouldn't wear those publicly without having skis on, but with all that latency that ain't safe.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Normally I'd say people who buy these cars are not near EV infrastructure, but I know thats not the case in the US.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Russian hookers with low ordit delivery anywhere in the world in 30min.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

But nobody wants those buildings.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

PaRleyyy!

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Every 2 years number of adds will increase by one and lenght by 5 second.

Have a nice hell in a retirement home.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Tough question is, can a tool be infringing anything?

Although I'd see a legal case if AI companies were to bill picture by picture, but now they are just billing for a tool subscription.

Still, would Microsoft be liable for my copy-pastes if they charged a penny every time I use it, or am I, if I sell a art piece that uses that infringing image?

AI could be scraping that picture from anywhere.

random_character_a , 4 months ago (edited 4 months ago)

Can a tool create? It generated.

Anyway, in case like this, is creation even a factor in liability?

In my opinion one who gets monetary value first from the piece should be liable.

NYTimes?

random_character_a , 4 months ago

How is this example relevant? You created the programming.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

I'm not non-sentient construct that creates stuff.

...and when the copyright law was written there was no non-sentient things gererating stuff.

random_character_a , 4 months ago (edited 4 months ago)

Yes, but in your previous example you person specifically created a machine to stab a specific person.

Example would be apt, if you created a program that generates programming for industrial machines to insert things in to stuff and then you uploaded a generated program without checking the code and it stabbed some random guy.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

You almost seem like you get the problem, but then you flounder away.

Law hasn't caught up with the world with generative programs. A.I will not be considered sentient and they will have this same discussion in court.

random_character_a , 4 months ago (edited 4 months ago)

Sorry, my bad. Fixed

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Argee to disagree and time will tell, but you must see there are factors that haven't existed before in the history of humanity.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Lets call it assisting image creation then.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

That joker could have been somebodys avatar picture with matching username.

A.I. can't understand copyright and useful A.I can't be build by protecting it from every material somebody thinks is their IP. It needs to learn to understand humans and needs human material to do so. Shitload of it. Who's up for some manual filtering?

If we go by NYTimes standards we better mothball the entire AI endeavor.

random_character_a , 4 months ago (edited 4 months ago)

There are company lines/slogans and then there are company action.

First one comes from PR and second is dictated by cold hard cash. Guess which one bends if there is a conflict?

random_character_a , 4 months ago

I think that generalization is acceptable.

Most avoid computers. My parents use'em and click everything they come across with. Decade ago I installed Linux in their shitty old computer, just so I can remove everything they can use to screw up the OS.

Everything was fine for few years till my father bought a new shitty low end computer from the black friday with all kinds of support and additional warranty BS that needed Windows with VNC that they really didn't understand.

So, the result of that study is BS. One reason is that people selling old people expensive shit they don't need is not considered a scam.

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Too good not to be ruined by humanity

random_character_a , 4 months ago

Is that Torvalds?

random_character_a , 5 months ago

Few years ago there was a story in a local paper about building automation systems running on Commadore 64 and still doing fine. Build by some company in the 80's. They weren't online, so no security issues.

Tried to find the article online but no luck. It would have been in local language anyway.