Authorities used a technique known as encapsulation to destroy the drug, pulverising the seized blocks with waste before mixing the resulting fine powder with cement, sand and glass.
Given that the painting is protected by glass, I don't really mind this protest. But I do hate when people destroy historical pieces in protest or like some stupid tourists have done in places like Italy.
No, they were farming advocates. From the article:
The French capital has seen protests by farmers in recent days, calling for an end to rising fuel costs and for regulations to be simplified - on Friday they blocked key roads in and out of Paris.
And I was not indicating that protesters and dumb tourists destroying precious art are on the same level. But there are other ways to draw attention to crises than destroying historic artifacts.
Just to play devils advocate, I decided to try to see if there were many instances of artwork actually being damaged. I found this article documenting the many "attacks" on artwork by climate protesters.
It does an excellent job illustrating how unjustified the outrage is, documenting how the attacks don't damage the artwork.
So they have more cameras than anywhere else but also a higher rate of road deaths. Evidently the cameras aren't effective and are mainly a regressive tax collection mechanism.
I'm still going to shoot you a youtube video about how western media is structured (i don't really watch youtube but sending ppl online books is a bit much) don't worry but in the meantime TBT
The article mentions that all the crew died in the crash, and is there any evidence that the shipment was secretly headed to Ukraine instead of Jordan?
As far as interview and torture, I'm not sure which party are you talking about, since the crew is dead.
You also generally can't open the wing in flight due to pressurization. At lower altitudes, where maybe they could open the door, they'd be going fast enough that there's no way they could stay on the wing.
If there was a maintenance issue, why did they sit on the tarmac for over 3 hours instead of returning to the gate? If they weren't able to taxi then get a damn tug.
No excuse to leave passengers sitting on the tarmac for over 3 hours with no air or water. In fact in the US it's illegal, not sure what Mexico's laws are.
Sounds like Aeromexico needs to review their policies that allowed this to happen.
Saudi Arabia tried that for years with US help, spend $100 billions (yes, billions) on it in fact, and it resulted in a failed operation. I wouldn't hold my breath.
I guess we could all see this one coming. IIRC all three nations had been suspended after their respective military coups, so it's understandable that the dictators had little simpathy for ECOWAS
Interesting Global News
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.