Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

AtHeartEngineer

@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world

Aspiring polymath. Applied R&D @ Privacy and Scaling Explorations 🦇🔊🐼🐍🟨🦀 Trying to make the internet better. Opinions are my own and subject to change

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

ARM is not paltry, it's in small/portable devices because it's efficient, not weak.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

Your article is a pretty reasonable and fair evaluation of farcaster, but then your post saying crypto/web3 is "mostly really dumb and bad" is not very nuanced. I know a lot of people on Lemmy don't like crypto, and that's what's in the meta right now, but if you are going to give something a fair shake, give it a fair shake, don't just anticipate backlash for covering a crypto topic and preface it with "it's mostly really dumb and bad". Ya there are a lot of scams, and a lot of bullshit projects, but there is a core of really useful infrastructure there, which farcaster is using for self sovereign account registration/ownership.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

Farcaster uses decentralized hubs and multiple clients, if you want global usernames you need a global db

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

Those are different design choices that have different trade offs, I didn't make these decisions, I'm just explaining how it is

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

I understand, don't get me wrong, 99% of stuff in crypto is hot garbage, but having a global database that isn't controlled by any one (or even dozen) entities is pretty powerful. The 2 guys that started farcaster could quit, or get hit by a bus, or decide it's not profitable enough and pivot, but at least you have control over your profile still. If reddit was decentralized more, they wouldn't be able to shut down their APIs for 3rd party clients.

Trust me I understand the criticism of block chains, but if we want open source and the internet to thrive and not be controlled by companies, we need a global layer that is neutral.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

But there's no global consensus, it's not trustless, and smart contracts unlock a lot of additional composable capabilities.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

Which is a whole lot of extra engineering that is already taken care of with a blockchain. Whether social networks should forget your username/registration is a different debate.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

Ok, we are talking in circles, you have your opinions, I have mine. If you want to talk about this over voice at any point, let me know, I don't think text is going to get anywhere, and Lemmy has a pretty strong bias against crypto (which I understand, but obviously disagree with)

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

Also, who decides who needs help? Some cases are obvious (neo-nazis), but many aren't, and the majority of people won't have enough context or time to make decisions for everything.

Let’s not make the same mistakes with AI that we made with social media (www.technologyreview.com)

From the article: "In particular, five fundamental attributes of social media have harmed society. AI also has those attributes. Note that they are not intrinsically evil. They are all double-edged swords, with the potential to do either good or ill. The danger comes from who wields the sword, and in what direction it is swung....

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

So many people on Lemmy are pessimistic as shit, makes it hard to read the comments sometimes

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

I think they are doing this above board, so it's just "contracts". It's not illegal, just shortsighted. Just like lobbying isn't technically bribery because it's "official bribery" so it's got a different name.

The White House wants to 'cryptographically verify' videos of Joe Biden so viewers don't mistake them for AI deepfakes (www.businessinsider.com)

The White House wants to 'cryptographically verify' videos of Joe Biden so viewers don't mistake them for AI deepfakes::Biden's AI advisor Ben Buchanan said a method of clearly verifying White House releases is "in the works."

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

The best way this could be handled is a green check mark near the video that you could click on it and it would give you all the meta data of the video (location, time, source, etc) with a digital signature (what would look like a random string of text) that you could click on and your browser would show you the chain of trust, where the signature came from, that it's valid, probably the manufacturer of the equipment it was recorded on, etc.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

Fair point, I agree with this. There should probably be another icon in the browser that shows if all, some, or none of the media on a page has signatures that can be validated. Though that gets messy as well, because what is "media"? Things can be displayed in a web canvas or SVG that appears to be a regular image, when in reality it's rendered on the fly.

Security and cryptography UX is hard. Good point, thanks for bringing that up! Btw, this is kind of my field.

AtHeartEngineer ,
@AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world avatar

I ran /r/cryptotechnology for years, and am good friends with the /r/cc mods. Reddit is a mess though, especially in the crypto areas.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines