Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

techspot.com

cosmicrookie , to Technology in Google, Snap, Meta and many others are "quietly" changing privacy policies to allow for AI training | It is sneaky and possibly illegal, according to the FTC
@cosmicrookie@lemmy.world avatar

I see some of you have never used a typewriter, and it shows

catloaf , to Technology in Google, Snap, Meta and many others are "quietly" changing privacy policies to allow for AI training | It is sneaky and possibly illegal, according to the FTC

The article talks about popups and other notifications. I personally have been getting a bunch of emails about policy changes. I don't see how that's in any way "quietly".

golli ,

But are those notifications and pop ups directly saying something like "from now on we will start to train ai on your information"?

Or is is one of the hundredth change of terms and conditions that people usually just skip, which mentions the major change in some fine print. Or a pop up designed with dark patterns to influence people into just accepting without actual informed consent?

Reverendender , to Technology in Google, Snap, Meta and many others are "quietly" changing privacy policies to allow for AI training | It is sneaky and possibly illegal, according to the FTC
@Reverendender@sh.itjust.works avatar

Unfortunately, as a governmental regulatory agency, the FTC can do absolutely nothing now without specific instructions from Congress. Thanks SJC!!

Rentlar , (edited )

Yeah the Constitution don't say anything bout AI so according to the originalists, companies can do anything they want, lol.

sunzu ,

Always have been this way until people revolt

douglasg14b ,
@douglasg14b@lemmy.world avatar

And depending on the results of the upcoming election the FTC may no longer exist afterwards anyways.

AGuyAcrossTheInternet , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

I'm happy I have y'all because I can satisfy my curiosity sparked by clickbait titles without ever giving those a click.

Seriously, the digest alone looks like the full thing is an absolute non-article.

tutus , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

I may have missed something.

Firefox 127 has introduced privacy tweaks that are causing user dissatisfaction, particularly due to changes like the separation of normal and private windows on the taskbar and the closing of private tabs when the main instance closes on iOS.

This sounds like it would be the expected behaviour?

  • Despite user complaints, the update includes new privacy and security enhancements such as upgrading subresources from HTTP to HTTPS and masking CPU architecture to reduce fingerprinting.

This sounds like a good thing?

  • Mozilla plans to address user feedback by reintroducing the "browser.privateWindowSeparation.enabled" preference as an opt-in and adding more intuitive privacy settings in future updates.

This sounds like a good thing?

orclev , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

More like Firefox users are surprised to find out some journalist thinks they're unhappy with "privacy tweaks" they hadn't even noticed.

jeffw , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

Speak for yourself

Voyajer , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version
@Voyajer@lemmy.world avatar

We are?

jabathekek ,
@jabathekek@sopuli.xyz avatar

but several users noticed and took to online forums to complain.

There's at least 7 users that are, therefore all 180,000,000 users are unhappy. It's extremely simple logic.

Ephera , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

What is this article talking about? That's a UX change. It has nothing to do with privacy or Mozilla's commitment to privacy.

jabathekek ,
@jabathekek@sopuli.xyz avatar

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

TxzK ,
@TxzK@lemmy.zip avatar

"but we gotta bait for clicks"

helenslunch , to Technology in Instagram's unskippable ads test causes outrage among users
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

And zero fucks were given about said outrage because none of them stopped using the platform or watching ads. Same story as ever.

PlasticHam , to Technology in Instagram's unskippable ads test causes outrage among users

advertising was spawned in the devils butt hole, go to hell advertisers

Kekzkrieger , to Technology in Instagram's unskippable ads test causes outrage among users

People will get outraged, scream for a bit and then accept it and keep using the service.

The additional ad-revenue will outscale the few users that quit by far and thus enshittification continues.

Tho i guess we should be happy for the few that escape the shothole instagram because social media is cancer anyways.

hiramfromthechi , to Technology in Instagram's unskippable ads test causes outrage among users
@hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world avatar

Thoughts and takeaways, plus 3 viable solutions:

Thoughts

1️⃣ I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Enshittification might be a good thing. Here's why

I don’t “like” that things have gotten this bad, but I do like that the worse things get, the more we can collectively organize and pressure reform to fix these things.

2️⃣ These tests are usually run on relatively small subsets of the user base. Remember when they rolled out hiding likes? That was rolled out periodically as well.

They typically also run different types of user bases. They already know the hardcore "influencers" and people who have built a public following will never leave the platform, since they're too invested already, and are the people/publications that contribute the most to network effects. I.e., you're on there because they're on there.

3️⃣ Remember when Tim Kendall (former executive at Facebook) says that they talked about Zuckerberg having ultimate control over these 3 distinct goals?

  1. Engagement: Drive up your usage. Keep you scrolling, liking, commenting, and remaining active on the platform.
  2. Growth: Encouraging you to keep coming back and inviting your friends, and getting them to invite their friends, and so on.
  3. Advertising: Make sure that as growth and engagement are happening, advertising revenue is maximized.

That's what's happening here—this is dial #3 being turned up.

Solutions

1. The most obvious: Delete your account

I know, I know—network effects are tough to break.

Tell your friends and family to delete theirs. Make yourself unreachable on Facebook-owned platforms.

Most people are posting less as traditional posts, and more as stories. If stories is your thing, Signal has stories. This is a really secure, private, and still convenient way to share whatever you want throughout the day.

If your favorite restaurant changes your dish's recipe, you'd prolly stop going, right? Well, that recipe's been changing, and we continue to put up with it despite an increasingly worse product.

2. For those looking for an alternative: Use Pixelfed

It doesn't have nearly the same type of content or user base size that Instagram does. But the same way that we built Facebook little by little, the same can be done for healthier alternative platforms.

This might also help your reduction in using social media, if you're looking for that.

3. For those who can't/will never leave Instagram: Use an open source native mobile app (Android-specific)

If you have an Android-based mobile operating system, there are apps like MyInsta and Instander that give you a native Instagram experience while blocking all of the ads.

They also have app-specific settings that allow you to customize your Instagram experience even further, such as (but limited to):

  • Downloading photos/reels/entire carousels
  • Reduces data sent to Instagram (analytics, ads, and other requests)
  • Ghost mode
  • Block reels, posts, stories, explore, comments, or whatever else
  • Tons more

I run a basketball media outlet (InThePaintCrew) and a lifestyle/photography page (LifeViaChicago), and being able to modify the experience to remove the noise/clutter when a native Instagram app is needed is helpful.

LordCrom , to Technology in Instagram's unskippable ads test causes outrage among users

Think of how much time I get back in my life if my wife couldn't send me 50 reels everyday

jjjalljs , to Technology in Instagram's unskippable ads test causes outrage among users

People need to stop using Instagram.

9488fcea02a9 ,

They cant. Its an addiction or stockholm syndrome

Crampon ,

I don't get it. I go to Instagram a couple of times a day. I start scrolling. The third post is something I haven't followed or liked. Then the fourth, and the fifth. So I close the app. I spend like 5 minuter there daily. The whole discover page is just filled with trash I have no interest for.

Sure I enjoy climbing. But I don't care for videos of people tying knots or lightly dressed chicks doing some low grade bouldering. Why does the app think it's better than me?

technocrit ,

People need to stop banning alternatives.

jjjalljs ,

I'm out of the loop. What?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines