There's 1440 minutes per day, a lock that's right twice a day is right for 1/720th of the time. A broken calendar, right for one day of 365, is actually accurate twice as often as a broken clock.
Not in the slightest. It was just his flimsy excuse to sue a competitor/someone he doesn't like, and the released emails show he doesn't believe a word of it. That's why he dropped it.
I don't think open-sourcing matters too much here: the datasets are all open sourced and the technique itself is published and well documented. OpenAI's advantage ia that they can burn the $10 million in processor energy that it costs to train each new model of GPT.
edit: Up through GPT-3, that is (GPT-4 is worse and I don't know why people would want it)
OpenAI, meanwhile, accused Musk of essentially being jealous that he was no longer involved in the startup, after he left OpenAI in 2018 following an unsuccessful bid to convince his fellow co-founders to let Tesla acquire it.
So a spoiled brat had a massive hissy fit after not getting his way? Yeah, that sounds like Elon alright.
The emails appeared to show Musk acknowledging the need for the company to make large sums of money to fund the computing resources needed to power its AI ambitions, which stood in contrast to the claims in his lawsuit that OpenAI was wrongly pursuing profit.
I think the news is that he's dropping his lawsuit, and the emails (which are old news in the tech press) are the presumed reason he's dropping the lawsuit.
Yes, you can have your own robot attack dog for about the same price as a high-end gaming PC. Some assembly possibly required, and you'll have to write your own attack software based on a manual poorly translated from Chinese (if you're lucky), but what do you expect at that price point? 🤨
cnn.com
Active