Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

techspot.com

Voyajer , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version
@Voyajer@lemmy.world avatar

We are?

jabathekek ,
@jabathekek@sopuli.xyz avatar

but several users noticed and took to online forums to complain.

There's at least 7 users that are, therefore all 180,000,000 users are unhappy. It's extremely simple logic.

jeffw , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version
@jeffw@lemmy.world avatar

Speak for yourself

orclev , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

More like Firefox users are surprised to find out some journalist thinks they're unhappy with "privacy tweaks" they hadn't even noticed.

tutus , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

I may have missed something.

Firefox 127 has introduced privacy tweaks that are causing user dissatisfaction, particularly due to changes like the separation of normal and private windows on the taskbar and the closing of private tabs when the main instance closes on iOS.

This sounds like it would be the expected behaviour?

  • Despite user complaints, the update includes new privacy and security enhancements such as upgrading subresources from HTTP to HTTPS and masking CPU architecture to reduce fingerprinting.

This sounds like a good thing?

  • Mozilla plans to address user feedback by reintroducing the "browser.privateWindowSeparation.enabled" preference as an opt-in and adding more intuitive privacy settings in future updates.

This sounds like a good thing?

AGuyAcrossTheInternet , to Technology in Firefox users are unhappy with privacy tweaks in the browser's latest version

I'm happy I have y'all because I can satisfy my curiosity sparked by clickbait titles without ever giving those a click.

Seriously, the digest alone looks like the full thing is an absolute non-article.

Reverendender , to Technology in Google, Snap, Meta and many others are "quietly" changing privacy policies to allow for AI training | It is sneaky and possibly illegal, according to the FTC
@Reverendender@sh.itjust.works avatar

Unfortunately, as a governmental regulatory agency, the FTC can do absolutely nothing now without specific instructions from Congress. Thanks SJC!!

Rentlar , (edited )

Yeah the Constitution don't say anything bout AI so according to the originalists, companies can do anything they want, lol.

sunzu ,

Always have been this way until people revolt

douglasg14b ,
@douglasg14b@lemmy.world avatar

And depending on the results of the upcoming election the FTC may no longer exist afterwards anyways.

catloaf , to Technology in Google, Snap, Meta and many others are "quietly" changing privacy policies to allow for AI training | It is sneaky and possibly illegal, according to the FTC

The article talks about popups and other notifications. I personally have been getting a bunch of emails about policy changes. I don't see how that's in any way "quietly".

golli ,

But are those notifications and pop ups directly saying something like "from now on we will start to train ai on your information"?

Or is is one of the hundredth change of terms and conditions that people usually just skip, which mentions the major change in some fine print. Or a pop up designed with dark patterns to influence people into just accepting without actual informed consent?

cosmicrookie , to Technology in Google, Snap, Meta and many others are "quietly" changing privacy policies to allow for AI training | It is sneaky and possibly illegal, according to the FTC
@cosmicrookie@lemmy.world avatar

I see some of you have never used a typewriter, and it shows

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines