Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

Revealed: a California city is training AI to spot homeless encampments

Last July, San Jose issued an open invitation to technology companies to mount cameras on a municipal vehicle that began periodically driving through the city’s district 10 in December, collecting footage of the streets and public spaces. The images are fed into computer vision software and used to train the companies’ algorithms to detect the unwanted objects, according to interviews and documents the Guardian obtained through public records requests.

uis ,
@uis@lemm.ee avatar

Is it done to give them home quicker? Is it?

*sigh*

CaptainProton ,

From the screen grabs, Since when is a legally street parked RV a homeless encampment? Looks like picking low hanging fruit for campaign talking points.

NedRyerson ,

I'm going to choose to believe that the goal is to know how to more efficiently deliver aid to those that need it

anonymous222 ,

Holy Mackerel! Could this be any more of an extremely boring dumb and awful cyberpunk dystopia? Good God!

profdc9 ,

Every year California is becoming more like Night City. Cyperpunk is supposed to be a dystopia, not an aspiration.

Fedizen ,

disgraceful. If I ever meet somebody involved in this....

dinckelman ,

The rates of suicide are going to skyrocket

KingThrillgore ,
@KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml avatar

This sounds like a real opportunity for false positives as opposed to, I dunno, engaging with the community?

crystalmerchant ,

We're all shocked that New Technology X is used to target and oppress people

TheControlled ,

Maybe you cope with the noxium of urine created amonia, the feces, the needles, the petty crime, and getting hassled and called a "fa**ot" for not having a $1 bill in San Jose, Oakland, SF, or LA but I cannot. All the well wishes are nice, and I would love love if the homeless could be put into unused office space or whatever pipedream is trendy at the time (and there have been a lot of pipedreams in my shortish life). But I want them gone, I want the worse-than-a-favela shantytowns, and I want the smell gone. I don't really give a shit how it's done so long as it isn't cruel or illegal.

So sick to death of all the magical thinking from other liberals in this state. We have the run the of the place and homeless is worse by 5 fold. And the Republicans are just practically begging for mass execution and deportation, as is their way.

I don't care anymore. Just go away.

Maggoty ,

You just want them gone, how uhh, how are you going to do that?

TheControlled ,

Duh, by gassing them or by firing squad!

How the fuck should I know? I just said idgaf how it's done, I just do.

Why can't I want homeless shit and piss and devastation out of my city while also have compassion for them as humans and help them? You people are so binary! You can do both.

Maggoty ,

Because the "fuck it I just want them gone" attitude is what's led to every high level human rights crime and mass murder we learn about in school.

If your problem is the smell, then let's put in latrines. Or, and I know this is a truly radical thought to American Capitalism, we can give them a place to live properly. Instead of forcing them to live like animals because the system refused to pay them enough to exist inside it properly.

csm10495 ,
@csm10495@sh.itjust.works avatar

So instead of spending X dollars to ensure people have homes, we spend X++ dollars to evict them from their spaces?

themurphy ,

How else would the mega rich be able to buy up the property and rent out the spaces for normal people to finance?

horsey ,

Sure, it’s like how NYC spent $150 million to bust people evading $105,000 in subway fees. Absolutely anything to avoid legitimately helping people.

KevonLooney ,

That is a stupid issue with Mayor Adams, but NYC legitimately spends millions on housing the homeless. The city has to get you shelter. It's the law.

jkrtn ,

How long has this been a law? The last time I went to NY I saw plenty of people sleeping in Penn Station.

KevonLooney ,

Since 1981:

https://www.cityandstateny.com/policy/2021/10/how-nycs-right-shelter-mandate-works/185933/

And why would you think people wouldn't be able to sleep in a train station? It's just like an airport.

jkrtn ,

At least one person I saw was in the stairwells on the way from a waiting area down to a train platform. I don't think passengers would want to sleep in the corridor between the gate and the plane at an airport, but you're right, perhaps it is only the locked door that is holding them back.

Now I am kinda curious why they were staying there if they were supposed to be guaranteed shelter. I wouldn't be surprised if the state failed to house them despite the law and that was the warmest place they could find or if the offered accommodations were unfit or dangerous.

KevonLooney ,

I wouldn't be surprised

You are just guessing. Look into it more. They are put up in places that are pretty decent for homeless shelters. They're usually cheap hotels, so you get your own room but no kitchen. It's not somewhere you want to live, but it's 100x better than a train station.

Most homeless people are fine in them, but they have security watching the door so you can't have a party, you can't have pets, and you can't have drugs. Maybe you can't smoke. Some people don't want to live under those conditions. Other people have mental illness and don't want to be in any shelter.

yoyolll ,
@yoyolll@lemmy.world avatar

Downvoted for stating an easily verifiable fact lol

KevonLooney ,

Yes, facts are one thing. But what about what I believe is true? Isn't that more important?

HaywardT ,

What I believe is important but what I feel is really what matters.

uriel238 ,
@uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

NYC has less than 5% unsheltered in contrast to San Francisco which has 30% unsheltered homeless per night. the driving force of this is the freezing winter in New York, which presents a hazard habitating outside. New York has to choose between making sure everyone gets a warm place, or they get to pick up the dead bodies.

California has a particularly high per-capita homeless population despite efforts toward housing. A large factor is NIMBY homeownership in which HOAs are determined to preserve property values and are a strong lobbying force.

KevonLooney ,

None of that makes any sense. California and NYC have similar property values. If anything, NYC price per square footage is higher on average. There are basically no houses on Manhattan, so almost all places to live have a condo board or co-op board. It's similar to an HOA.

California always had nice weather. Homeless people only existed in large numbers after Governor Reagan emptied the mental institutions and provided few resources for the residents. They literally took away their homes. Before that, NYC had more homeless people.

https://calmatters.org/commentary/2019/03/hard-truths-about-deinstitutionalization-then-and-now/

California could house almost all of its homeless people if they spent the money. It's not even that expensive compared to the alternative.

uriel238 ,
@uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Just to clarify, when comparing New York City to San Francisco, I'm talking about the percentage of the city's homeless that aren't covered by available shelters, whether state-sponsored, churches or non-profit. I wasn't talking about whether New York City has more homeless than San Francisco (which I do not know) but that the shelters in New York cover most of the homeless, while that is not true in San Francisco.

The second paragraph is about California as a whole state. And yes, we could solve our homeless problem, but landowners actively lobby against it, and our state government is about as corrupt as any of the others.

postmateDumbass ,

Other states are sending their homeless to California.

KevonLooney ,

Same with NYC. There's no excuse besides being cheap and lazy.

postmateDumbass ,

It will pay for itself in 1,500 years!

assassinatedbyCIA ,

The suffering is the point. They want the threat of homelessness to keep the masses in line.

Empricorn ,

It's literally cheaper to provide the unhoused with healthcare. Not just for them, but for housed people and all taxpayers. But we (as a society) don't. At this point I feel it's literally about cruelty, and punishing them for their "life choices". And you think we'll just give them homes!?

unphazed ,

But Sosh uh izm!

dinckelman ,

Next time you ask yourself that question, remember that these cunts are spending your tax dollars to hurt those who have nothing left to lose. Vote them out

Syndic ,

And considering that veterans are over represented in the homeless population, they actively hurt those who have served the country instead of helping them. Shameful!

wolfruff ,

Hate my state.

TheControlled ,

By all means, find a better one.

qdJzXuisAndVQb2 ,

Uf, this is not a great response. That citizen should stay and add their valuable voice to calls and demands for improvement.

TheControlled ,

Someone who hates California sounds like a useless fucking Californian already--lacking "value."

qdJzXuisAndVQb2 ,

Fair point, they should be constructive, I guess.

DoucheBagMcSwag ,

Not... Everyone can afford to pick up everything and move or they may have other factors like job and family keeping them there

wolfruff ,

Yeah im trying my damnest but this state is meant to keep people poor.

TheControlled ,

Real shit? No fucking way bro. Please explain what being poor and trapped feels like to me.

root ,

Vote better.

redfox ,
@redfox@infosec.pub avatar

Doesn't the Democratic party have complete majority control of most cities and the state legislature?

That's a party which usually claims to be about taking care of poor people or 'housing is a human right', but I keep seeing evidence that part of California's issue is residents eliminating any/all zoning that isn't classic single family homes in places where there's tons of good jobs, but super expensive housing.

It's hard to wade through political party propaganda, but I thought this was well documented.

I don't live in CA, so I don't really know more than articles publish, but it just seems like they voted for the more American liberal/progressive party and still aren't getting those values?

root ,

Yeah, it turns out that politicians in both parties are garbage people pandering to the masses.

Instead of voting along party lines people need to vote for real people that can act like adults and actually govern. Most of our government officials are now too busy passing meaningless resolutions, performing the same study that's popular in all the other cities, or busy on social media pandering to vocal minorities.

Morefan ,

These 'homeless' are no better than Gypsies. They reject society and take advantage of the good nature in people. They are scumbags and do not deserve sympathy.

If they can stand on the same corner every day at the same time they are more than capable of getting a job.

sfxrlz ,

that is a disgusting take

Morefan ,

Reality isn't here to amuse you. People with nice shoes and cell phones aren't 'homeless'. They prey on the naive.

coffeebiscuit ,

Are you talking about billionaires?

Wereduck ,

You are completely divorced from the reality on the ground.

A good chunk of the unhoused (at least where I live, US CA) have jobs, it's just not enough for rent or they can't find a place because of poor credit, which means the places available are even more expensive.
Rent has increased faster than median income, and way faster than low income.

Most unhoused are there temporarily. Anything nice they have may be from before they got into their present situation. And what are they supposed to do? Pawn off their cell phone for pennies on the dollar?

The explosion in number of unhoused people is not just a bunch of people happening to have some sort of moral failure all at once. The simpler explanation is that our economy and society is failing. And what do we expect to see as resources are hoarded by the powerful at exponentially increasing rates? Where do those resources come from?

Also self report on your attitude toward Roma people.

Morefan ,

Gaslight all you want. Homeless people are not 'down-and-out'. There's plenty of help for those people who want it. The rest are scammer scumbags.

your attitude toward Roma people.

Again you reject reality - https://www.policemag.com/special-units/article/15349960/gypsies-kings-of-con

Wereduck ,

Do you know how much work it is to live unhoused? How uncomfortable and dehumanizing? If you are completely without shelter, how it is after it rains, or the air is choked with smoke during fire season?

It seems like you have just one explanation for everything here. When there's a problem, it's because of some moral failing that has to be punished. The publication you reference is telling.

Your attitude toward both Roma and unhoused is an outside look in, entirely through the lens of criminality. There is no understanding there. You are missing the big picture, the why behind all of the things people do.

If you really want to scam people, you start an LLC and live comfortably off of other people's work, like, you know, rich people do.

blackn1ght ,

This comment is so ridiculous it has to be some sort of bait.

RaoulDook ,

Yeah it's a bit racist about the Gypsies on top of the rest of the shit-take

Morefan ,

Not my fault you have your head up your ass. Open your eyes. Think for yourself.

Too scary huh? Never mind just go back to sleep, be a good little NPC.

systemglitch ,

When housing becomes a for profit business, this is the result. It's happening in my city in Canada as well.

I have a homeless community sprouting up behind our cul de sac and it gets bigger each spring. It likely disappears in the winter, I've no desire to walk through the uncleared snow to find out. And a few blocks away people are camping out on sidewalks everywhere, it's becoming an epidemic, in a city that was once very affordable.

Fredselfish ,
@Fredselfish@lemmy.world avatar

Tulsa Oklahoma is full of homeless encampments and this is supposed to be one of the cheaper states to live in. Yet landlords want to price their places like the bigger cities. It is scary to see what cost to rent in this town compared to the pay being offer for jobs. Its wonder there isn't more homeless.

MyNamesNotRobert , (edited )

Being homeless is like the software piracy equivalent of housing. You're not paying but rich people are "losing money" since homeless people aren't paying them $4000+/month therefore it's a crime.

root ,

Do you really think the concerns about encampments are all from rent seeking landlords?

Here in Minneapolis it's the number of murders, gang violence (territory), rape, and human trafficking.

Second tier issues are overdoses, fires, sanitation (which doesn't sound like much until you see the people with fingers and toes rotting off), and crime rates increasing as they try to make enough money to feed their drug habits.

It's a very complex issue. Much more complex than "the landlords are upset people aren't paying rent".

werefreeatlast ,

They start out identifying the various "races" probably. I'm a brown person and would like to keep reminding everyone that different races do not exist in the sense that it is not a scientific term with any meaning. A term with proper meaning is "species" and there is only one "homosapiens".... it's not just Juantastic who lives under the bridge, it's all of us. We are all a single family. Anyway, would you let your brother or sister or parents or relatives go live under a bridge and hungry? Nah right? What if they were thousands of miles away and didn't have a place to sleep in? Still nah! You would do whatever to try to help! So why are there homeless people in every city and why do we not help Gaza and Ukraine people? Right? We need to do a better job!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines
    •