Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

PatFussy

@PatFussy@lemm.ee

俺はおちんちんが大好きなんだよ

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

PatFussy ,

I hate the idea of treating homeless like babies. Most of these people got to where they are by choices. If they wanted to stay at the church they probably can. Most churches I know have cots for people down and out. If these people wanted to stay at the church they would have.

PatFussy , (edited )

TLDR.

I need 21 words max. I'm kidding I read your pointless rant and I have only 1 observation. You are either stretching the truth or you are a liar. Take care my homeless friend.

PatFussy ,

LMAO did you only get 5 words in and decided to respond? I think you need a TLDR more than me

PatFussy ,

It's almost like time progresses

PatFussy ,

I know this is a funny haha but NGL I'd rather have this bleak future than revert back to 1997 with FOSS alternatives.

PatFussy ,

It was not 'pictures of monkeys' it was art. It was digital art. If you don't get that then you don't understand money laundering.

PatFussy ,

Can you imagine caring about children's well development? Gross

PatFussy ,

Were you downloading more ram or was that all BaNano faucet

PatFussy ,

This is actual snake oil

PatFussy , (edited )

I remember I spoke with the professor at UCSD working on this eTPU alternative to regular PUR this article is referencing a few years back. He was frothing at the mouth of selling this as a product as he was eager to talk with big companies to sell the research, it turned me off 100%. I asked if it decomposes just as well anaerobically and he said it's not intended to be used outside of composting scenarios. It also has little shelf life and more hygroscopic which reduces use performance over time. So there we have it. Another green wash situation. Your composter is NOT going to accept this when they see it x10000000

PatFussy ,

Sending plastic to the landfill that doesn't decompose anaerobically is essentially the same as sending regular plastic. Also, using shitty material that has a shorter shelf life also means it allows for planned obsolescence for items you wouldn't have thought was possible. For instance that can allow companies to put best use by dates on a refrigerator, home insulation, soles on shoes etc. For single use items it would make it so stock would be thrown out if not consumed more frequently. We would end up sending even more plastic to the landfills.

PatFussy ,

Bukele and his government is nothing like Trumps. He doesn't want El Salvador to use USD as the standard currency, that's it..

PatFussy ,

You seem to underestimate the gang problem. I was in Ilobasco a few years ago and my family that lives there urged me not to go outside past 7pm because I can be a target or even kidnapped. Like wtf why do the gangs get to dictate curfew in 2017? Past nightfall you have to turn the lights off so people in the streets can't peek into your house through the metal guard rails on all the windows. It was eye opening to say the least. Since Nuevas Ideas I have only heard good things and good changes to the area from my family. There were so many people associated to the gangs that I have little sympathy for those 'innocently accused'. I would rather a few loosely incorporated get caught than let the gangs do what they want freely.

PatFussy ,

I'm a little naive about how this works but how does buying and selling unlisted securities work? What does it mean to get unlisted stock? If someone was given stock as a perk but was fired what happens to the stock? I've never worked at a startup so I don't know how that works..

PatFussy ,

No it's someone who shops at target openly

Google fires employee who protested Israel tech event, as internal dissent mounts (www.cnbc.com)

During a keynote speech in New York on Monday from the managing director of Google’s Israel business, an employee in the company’s cloud division protested publicly, proclaiming “I refuse to build technology that powers genocide.”...

PatFussy ,

That guy probably posts here

PatFussy ,

Based on internet fan fiction and doomerpilled

PatFussy , (edited )

They should have banned it years ago when the thought of data security came into question. Tik Tok is brain poison, more than regular internet dosage. It's cocomelon for adolescents.

PatFussy ,

RIP Robin Williams

PatFussy ,

I can't upload any image so I'm way ahead of you

PatFussy ,

Join lemm.ee and you would be golden

PatFussy ,

Let me try sending you something

Edit: I got error 413 that I don't have that functionality. Don't you see it can never be.

PatFussy ,

I'm imagining the RPMs on these babies trying things trying to load Gigs worth of data at a time. I like to think it will start glowing from the heat generated.

PatFussy ,

I am curious. If you were a Chief officer or VP or something. What kind of changes would you do to make it profitable? Reduce server count? Roll back old.reddit? Just cut overhead? Get rid of Spez? How can they possibly make it profitable given where they are now?

PatFussy ,

That's why I said given where they are now, how would it even be possible. What can they do outside of raise prices of reddit stickers or ad-free reddit.

PatFussy ,

This isn't a VR headset though...

PatFussy ,

Would you call Google glass or hololense a VR machine? No you wouldn't. Apple fits right in there with them

A lot of Redditors hate the Reddit IPO | Reddit warned us that its users were a risk factor, and boy do they sound excited about shorting its stock. (www.theverge.com)

A lot of Redditors hate the Reddit IPO | Reddit warned us that its users were a risk factor, and boy do they sound excited about shorting its stock.::Reddit seems like a likely candidate for a meme stock. But the actual reaction suggests that r/WallStreetBets isn’t going to send the stock to the moon.

PatFussy ,

Like how they did Robinhood stock right

PatFussy ,

Tell him it's a great idea! 👍

PatFussy ,

I thought it was the shroud of turin I'm a bad catholic

PatFussy ,

PatFussy ,

Something something loss hahaha memes

PatFussy ,

Stop dead naming X

PatFussy ,

Sad if true

PatFussy ,

I have only ever used prime as a last resort. I don't watch much TV but what's available through prime is usually pretty bad IMHO. I would go as far as to say if someone goes to prime to watch things like rings of power then they probably have bad taste.

PatFussy , (edited )

I lmao be honest I only recognized the boys from your list and I thought that show was boring

PatFussy ,

You don't need to own your home to split it with a homeless. Don't be so careless, share your living space

PatFussy ,

Go you. Be the change you want to see in the world.

PatFussy ,

Big dog why are you going back in time 2 months to respond to this

PatFussy ,

Big dog 2 months... If you knew how companies figure out their pollution metrics you would be very sad.

As for a better metric, I don't know. Everything is tied to cost so it's really dumb

PatFussy ,

I don't even know what you are responding toqnd don't care to look

PatFussy ,

Remind me then

PatFussy ,

Yep you got me, I make shit up on the fly.

PatFussy ,

Too lazy

PatFussy ,

Too bad why? You had a counterargument or something?

PatFussy ,

Oh okay, I feel like responding now so I reread.

So the evidence they provided was what I said is carefully curated. I work in sustainability and I see how people mess with numbers. I also know info from China is famous for fudging numbers as well. I don't think CO2 is a good metric as it is difficult to track. The way companies track CO2 now is usually by spend so they convert $$$ to CO2 output through a calculator. It's really not efficient.

You asked me what is an alternative and I said I don't know. I really don't, unless we have a way of tracking what comes in and out of a business and how it is used.

PatFussy , (edited )

CO2 is NOT the only metric being captured by global agencies, it's just what was said in the comment above and is usually the target to showcase how responsible the use is basically. I am not saying that the metric in itself is bad but it is easy to mislead. China is not trustworthy when it comes to capturing data like this because their companies are basically required to make greater China look good. This is a separate beast.

If you look into how a body like the EPA calculates their emissions they reference the greenhouse protocol. In an ideal world, all use and all waste goes through a method like this protocol and individuals calculate their emissions. Governing bodies and academics alike would be using software to track each ounce of output based on raw materials. If you purchased or created a good, you should be able to track and show end of life for each individual component. This is just not the case. People don't know what is in the stuff they buy. There is a flurry of life cycle analyses cradle to gate or gate to gate or cradle to grave being produced currently to bridge this gap but it currently is not the standard for identifying output.

How does a company like Walmart track all of the emissions produced (by their farmers, their logistics, the raw material manufacturing, etc.) if it's difficult? The answer is they give ballpark numbers based on how much was purchased. Companies now have decided to use a number that was calculated based on various spends and convert that to output.

How does a country like the US measure then? In the US there are regulatory bodies that check if what we say is true but it's a complete joke. There waaaaaayyy too much data for these bodies to go through so they usually report whatever the company reports.

Circling back to China and why I say not to trust the CO2 calculations is that these companies are not trustworthy. I'll be honest I don't know if there are similar regulatory bodies in China for emissions but I doubt it. It's what allows companies to do illegal dumping into rivers and let's many claim net zero. I'm assuming based on the time you responded to me that you are in China so maybe you can elucidate me on how I get this wrong.

PatFussy ,

English is not my first language either and I type the way I speak. So I might say things wrong but language was never my strong suit. I only commented because I have a friend from mainland China who only speaks around this time.

I hope we can both agree that using evaluations made by China is not always the best. I could have replaced CO2 with # of immigrants or %breast feeding and we would have the same issues. However, the use of CO2 as a metric for a developing country is specially odd given how difficult it is to track in places like the US for EU. Hence, I say don't trust it.

Can we agree there or is this all still baseless conjecture and erroneous conclusions?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines
    •