Your Honor, we are in court today to discuss piracy of the following films:
Whisper in the Wind,
To Each His Own,
Put it Where It Doesn't Belong,
My Pipes Need Cleaning,
All Tit-Fucking, Volume Eight,
I Need Your Cock,
Ass-Worshipping Rim-Jobbers,
My Cunt and Eight Shafts,
Cum Clean,
Cum-Gargling Naked Sluts,
Cum Buns Three,
Cumming in a Sock,
Cum on Eileen,
Huge Black Cocks with Pearly White Cum,
Slam It Up My Too-Loose Ass,
Ass Blasters in Outer Space,
Blowjobs by Betsy,
Sucking Cock and Cunt,
Finger My Ass,
Play with my Puss,
Three on a Dildo,
Girls Who Crave Cock,
Girls Who Crave Cunt,
Men Alone Two-The K.Y. Connection,
Pink Pussy Lips,
All Holes Filled with Hard Cock.
What’s more disturbing than the filmmakers continually trying to get the ips, is that the courts keep entertaining the filmmakers. At what point does the legal system say enough?
As another comment says, git is just the version control software. You mean a decentralized hub for sharing git repos I assume. Git hub/lab/whatever are just websites that share a link fundamentally. They also all store the data for your repo, but there's no reason that would need to be stored in the same place as the hub to find repos.
ENS, unstoppable domains, tor, i2p, ipfs... I think this is actually good for the Internet, it will normalize and popularize private, censorship resistant tech. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
Prediction: Once everything is an app, there'll be no need for generic encryption and anyone found using it will be labelled a terrorist enabler and locked up.
Yeah, that whole angle has me wondering if changing my own habits to gain privacy that the average person doesn't get will just put a target on my back. If they want to spy on everyone to figure out who is a danger to the ruling class and status quo, they could eventually just start treating anyone that they can't spy on as suspects and either use other mechanisms to break through that privacy to make sure or just criminalize that stuff.
They were trying but I think the last round of laws failed because they'd have to admit that the current commonly used encryption schemes have backdoors and wouldn't need to be banned when the whole question of "what about business uses?" came up.
That’s exactly what the article is about. It basically points out that mm-nintendo.com domain is owned by MarkMonitor the brand reputation firm that also owns a bunch of mm-{brand name}.com domains. And basically points out that while it does look like it seems like a scam domain, it really isn’t
A few years back Dana White said he was going to crack down on illegal UFC streams. Then one night at a press conference he announced, "You guys remember the guy I was talking about who was doing the illegal streams? WE GOT HIM. He apologized and promised he'll never do it again." These losers are completely out of touch.
I received DMCA from Nintendo in 2015 from dmca@millernash.com which was also confirmed to be legitimate as authorized agents.
Big companies like Nintendo doesn’t have to use their own in house corporate counsel for this kind of enforcement. They can and often do task it out to firms that’ll take on both discovery and take down based on given directive on an agreed rate that’d be cheaper than them doing it in house, so they don’t need to train up an entire department on the skill set required.
The sad part is, a few years ago I gladly paid for the Disney Hulu bundle along with HBO. Now it's all gone to shit and they never even improved the Disney Plus app. My subscription payments are long gone and I'm better off for it.
If I can pay a single reasonable fee and have access to literally everything, I do.
If I could do that without having to go through the effort of finding everything myself, I would absolutely pay for that. I used to stream because it was better. I can’t afford that now though, and not everything is even available.
Yeah i tend to forget that github is in the US and their allmighty DMCA can be used to take down anything. i just have a hard time believing this shit would fly in the EU.
It would, it has, next step after DMCA even in the EU is legal action, which nintendo already fought in court. I don't know about you but I'm not ready to defend someone else's code in court.
Comment OP is forking Yuzu code, we're talking about how this is fair or unfair. When you fork DMCA'd code you open yourself up to litigation and having to defend someone else's code in court.
I won't, OP might. Did you actually not read the context before replying? Lol.
Costs depend on a lot of factors. If you are technically adept you might be able to get away with 20 bucks a month for the whole setup but most folks wouldn’t imo. I also have some old hardware I was able to use and upgraded it. Initial invest for a homeserver varies greatly depending on who you know.
If you want to know more please ask. You can also hit me up on matrix. Link in bio.
I did a similar setup for my own cloud on several Raspberry Pis (one master and two backup devices). The backups are placed offsite and sync the entire content of the master device. The next step I want to try now is running a Proxmox cluster (on x86) that now only syncs contents but also provides identical copies in a high availability setup (like a "real" cloud would).
Thats actually not a bad idea. Long term selfhosted cloud solutions will have to compete on availability/redundancy. You might want to help the NC folks to implement that on their docker setup or something?
torrentfreak.com
Top