Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

Jimmycrackcrack

@Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Never heard of anything on the playlist before and I doubt I would have really stumbled on it normally because it's not the style I normally seek out but so far it all slaps. How is it they're allowed to include this stuff on their website?

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Sounds like you unintentionally fit the brief anyway.

Does Matrix have anything akin to 'posts' as in Lemmy and Reddit?

I haven't really used any kind of messenger service since probably MSN Messenger and IRC back in the day so I'm a bit behind on a lot of the basics. Part of what's quite different now than the experience then is what modern messenger protocols seem to be used for, as in they have public channels dedicated to topics that function...

Jimmycrackcrack OP ,

Matrix is for chatting, not posts.

This is what I find so odd about modern messaging systems being used in the manner that they're used. I get that the immediacy of conversation is sometimes extremely helpful for discussing topics and I can understand why like minded people would then want to hang out together to have those conversations, but like, it's also kind of flawed for this because of the ephemeral nature of conversation. That's why I wondered if this flaw had been addressed through some forum-like features.

Jimmycrackcrack OP ,

I'm using Element. Good to know about the threads thing. They didn't work how I expected they would, I thought I'd be able to essentially do something similar to forum where I come up with a topic of discussion, name it and have a means of identifying all discussion within this topic as part of the thread, the way it works is kind of like that, but it's more that something has to have first been said, and then you can reply to it in a thread thus essentially making it a thread. I kind of get it, it's a bit like how emails work i that regard.

It looks like it would be hard to entice people to reply to things I ask in a thread since they have to think to click reply in thread and which message uttered as part of a topic should be considered the start of a thread is random and up to the reply-er so someone might pick something said much later in the conversation, and click 'reply in thread' to that thus splintering everything. Good to know there's something at least. I kind of thought it might use something more akin to so I could make my first statement intended to be part of a thread thus starting a thread and then anyone joining it later could easily slot in to the timeline of discussion by just using the hashtag. I see there's a list of threads so hopefully people would use that, but it seems like a lot of hoping everyone employs best practice for the feature to really be useful.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Given your experience and the way they made you feel from the practitioners' sheer ignorant and biased approach I would have thought you'd definitely be the first to call the program "dumb" as the very least of the criticisms to be levelled at it.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

I think my surprise here is that given the program's reputation, and your experience with it, it seems there was quite some gulf between theoretical intent and practice. Educating children about drugs, probably seems relatively uncontroversial to most, I think you could get a lot of people with otherwise pretty different views on drugs to get behind the idea. The way the D.A.R.E. program went about it and the content of the program and the accuracy of the education they attempted to deliver seem from a distance to have been very questionable. This is why it's so perplexing to me why you hold such a surprising level of respect for D.A.R.E., I mean sure the intent could have been education, but it doesn't sound very much like the intent and the reality had a lot of overlap. I'm careful with my wording here because where I grew up we didn't have 'D.A.R.E.' specifically so I can only form judgment based on what one hears and reads about the program.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

At least it's broadly kind of informative in description of some of the categories before the 'continued' section. That may seem a low bar but I guess efforts to educate on this topic have set such a drastically low bar in decades past that it's encouraging to see it lifted slightly off the floor. The categorisation scheme takes a bit of a nosedive when they get to marijuana which for some reason has its own category, also for all the drugs and categories they describe they make the mistake of failing to describe the effects that make people want to use the drugs in the first place. I can see why they might be hesitant to do that, you don't want to actively encourage people to use the drugs, but I remember when getting similar lessons on the topic thinking that it was an obvious omission because it's hardly like people took the drugs, repeatedly, because of how much they enjoyed the "impairment" especially as I has my own first hand experience running directly counter to it. The failure to address the positive sensations taking such drugs produces that have caused people throughout all of human history to seek drugs out, damages the credibility of the information since it clearly sought to discourage at the cost of objectivity.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

As part of just living in.... the world, I already kind of assumed it was possible for some parties, credit card companies in particular, to pry in to my financial activity and also interested governments to compel banks to hand over whatever they had, and/or possibly just hand over everything about everyone to government all the time automatically. This was bad enough, however, even I was surprised and shocked to learn how bad it was with my own bank when they sent me a letter gleefully telling me that as of the date of the letter they had now managed to sell my data to even more 3rd parties. I was not, up until that point aware that they were selling my data at all, and that 3rd parties (other than the credit card company) were getting access to it not just because of powers to compel, like people might expect of governments, but purely because the bank was literally handing it over to whoever was willing to pay for it, no consent on my part necessary. I don't know what changed that required them to apparently have to now disclose this to me, but I assume that they were forced, hence the letter. The sneaky motherfuckers didn't frame it that way though, not "due to recent legislation the bank is obliged to inform you blah blah blah", no just "good news removed, we were selling your data, we still are, but we used to too, and now we're selling it to more people, hope you like egregiously unethical behaviour because we put a travesty in to our travesty so you can experience a travesty while processing the first travesty".

Jimmycrackcrack ,

But how does he know that it isn't that he was that good? He can't remember.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

It's not reviewed and may have harmful content, so please read the harmful content on an app instead?

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Hopefully they won't start standardizing TV's that have to phone home periodically and if they are denied this for long enough, refuse to work until they've established a connection to their servers. I'm not aware of anything that does this but it's definitely what will start happening if enough people disable network connectivity to circumvent smart features. This wouldn't worry me too much since I'd likely want to use the device as just a display anyway and plug something useful in to the HDMI but if the whole machine is somehow tied up in these sophisticated operating systems, what if they just disable HDMI until they get their way?

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Is any of that information centralised anywhere? I still have and love my old dumb TV, but I want to be prepared for when I am inevitably dragged in to the "smart" era.

Jimmycrackcrack , (edited )

That's a bit like me, definitely like me for some specific tasks, but as a ratio it's very similar to my attitude towards packing, doing homework/assignments, preparing for job interviews, preparing for any important impactful life moments except with the key difference being the label for the yellow section. For me in those scenarios, including packing, the yellow section represents time spent mentally avoiding the stress and anxiety that comes from mentally preparing for packing or anything else unpleasant by suddenly getting very interested in a random topic and reading all about it, or playing a specific videogame to absolutely ridiculous excess, or watching every episode of a long running series from at least 20 years ago, if I have it available I'm also doing most of these other tasks with a lot of weed.

It's especially shitty because to the outsider, this looks like laziness, and that's not wrong, I mean it's much easier and more pleasurable to do that stuff than the hard thing you should be doing, but I'm not really enjoying that stuff because I'm doing it hard. It might sound impossible to watch a TV series hard, but doing anything in this state is a heart racing extreme form of mental concentration to absolutely fully and completely consume my mind with anything except the source of stress. So it looks like I'm watching TV and laughing at the jokes and I am, but I'm also simultaneously really stressed and tired from expending so much mental energy in to blocking everything else out. Truly a fantastic skill since I'm able to achieve precisely nothing, still get really tired, look like I didn't do anything that would break a sweat at all and still feel like shit and be completely stressed by the end which itself will usually serve as a reminder of how little progress has been made towards the thing I was trying to avoid thinking about which induces a lot of anxiety and self loathing that needs to be fixed by even more intense even harder doing of anything else.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

I don't know why that weird ass little gross thing is so appropriate but that is probably the best possible response lol.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Nah they really like it, it's making me feel like a weird uncaring sociopath that I'm just really not that interested in the multiple daily photos, but the rest of us around the person sharing can't seem to get enough of it. I don't know why I don't care so much, I've met the kid and they're nice enough, I hope I'm someone they'll be glad to have in their lives and form an affection for but you can't really convincingly fake intense interest and emotional investment and much as I'd like it to be, that just isn't my natural reaction. I like to think if I have ever have kids it'd be different otherwise the poor kid would have to deal with someone totally uninterested for the rest of their lives.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Well I mean what did you just read? He already said those are the facts bro.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

I'd also have a little touch more of respect to Jack for not flogging a dead horse here and backing off when he realized it was pretty serious.

Jimmycrackcrack , (edited )

Around about 2009 or so I had a mobile plan with Virgin that did that same trick (I think this was plugging your phone in to a computer as a modem as opposed to wireless hotspot but same thing anyway) and it was limited to 5 MEGABYTES after which they wanted 15pence per KILOBYTE I couldn't believe what I was reading. I never ran afoul of it because I checked this out first when buying the plan and made sure never to use that function but it just seemed literally unreal. I've been shocked at how much things cost before but that seemed more like a mistake or something, I just can't imagine they ever actually made anyone pay for that, the negative press would be too bad. It was not unheard of at the time for people to have excess charges on limited plans waived because it was a shock and they were unaware or unprepared for those charges accruing so the idea that someone might have checked emails, read a news article, checked Facebook and possibly a web video having not read the fine print and ended up with tens if not over a hundred GBP of charges just doesn't seem feasible. Really fucking crazy.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

The really fun part is that the first few times this happens to you, you're the same age and feel insecure that someone your age achieved more, but as you age in to your mediocrity you gradually get to see people who are younger and younger than you achieve more than you ever did, and now, likely ever will. But hey, there's always the memes to take your mind off it... oh wait.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

What's the original clip from?

Jimmycrackcrack ,

It's rarely if ever a bad thing to provide additional detail and improve understanding of a headline. The commenter didn't defend Huffman's compensation, even going so far as to lament it will appear that they are an apologist for the CEO. They also didn't address their comment to moderators which is important as the title of this Lemmy post implies both that the comment was addressed to unpaid moderators of Reddit and also by doing so, that it was condescendingly justifying to them why their work should go unpaid while the CEO of Reddit is paid handsomely.

The fact that the compensation package isn't literally $193M cash isn't saying the situation is just fine and dandy and neither is pointing that fact out. Headlines can reduce information to levels that reach meaninglessness, especially when they do so on purpose to be incendiary. If this commenter adds correct details to the situation, deciding if those details changes its moral complexion is up to the readers of the comment, personally I don't think they do. I don't see however, why there needs to be a separate discussion on lemmy not about the actual issue that pissed everyone off, but instead shitting on some random commenter who added relevant detail to the original issue that was actually worthy of discussion in the first place.

Google Allows Creditors to Brick Your Phone (lemmy.world)

I installed NetGuard about a month ago and blocked all internet to apps, unless they're on a whitelist. No notifications from this particular system app (that can't be disabled) until recently when it started making internet connection requests to google servers. Does anyone know when this became a thing?...

Jimmycrackcrack ,

I'm surprised it would be on the play store since presumably if you were a carrier or creditor of some kind you want this installed in a pretty clandestine way and wouldn't want to draw attention to it by having an app store listing.

Are there tools that exist to anonymize writing styles?

I feel like with the rise of AI something that anonymizes writing styles should exist. For example it could look for differences in American versus British spelling like color versus colour or contextual things like soccer versus football and make edits accordingly. ChatGPT could be fed a prompt that says "Rewrite the following...

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Hmm. But like there's stuff in there that isn't even part of the substance of what you said. Like the call to action at the end. That's the type of thing you'd want to be pretty sure you really wanted to do in some circumstance where you want to communicate on a matter in plain sight but obscure your identity, as such a matter would presumably be pretty important and high stakes.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

If updates are approved automatically, why have a system where approval is required?

Jimmycrackcrack ,

That's my point. Updates pose some kind of risk to something and so require approval before they're allowed on a corporate owned phone. But the update approvals are just automated, so....

Jimmycrackcrack ,

On the face of it, option B would seem to be clearly better, but I'm just trying to understand how an approval system can work if it automatically just approves things, that sounds more like slight delay system than an approval system. Maybe I'm misinterpreting, the way I was reading it sounded something like "the process of approving updates would be cumbersome and time consuming for humans to do, that's why the process of calling things approved is automated" but perhaps what you were saying is the "the process of evaluating whether approval should be granted is automated and done by software that can figure out if the update will or won't cause problems and then either does or doesn't approve depending on the evaluation" which sounds great, but I just didn't think that was actually a thing that could be done by software. Is that actually how it works? There's software that can determine if OS updates to phones does or doesn't cause unexpected problems with an entity's existing systems? I just thought for sure you'd need a human to do that given how hard it is to define a 'problem' and how specific the needs of an enterprise would be.

If my initial understanding was correct, that the software just does the job of ticking 'approved' for you, so you don't have to tick it yourself, then I am completely at a loss in understanding how that is any better than simply having no approval process and just allowing updates without oversight since it's functionally the same, except a little bit slower (albeit only a little slower because it's automated).

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Notes of Smothers O'Neil to this post

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Ah is that why there seemed to be this thing called Vehicular Manslaughter in American TV shows? I don't know if we have that here in Australia but I always wondered why such a thing existed since surely it was just... manslaughter whether a vehicle was involved or not.

Roku TV bricked until agreeing to new terms of service

See title - very frustrating. There is no way to continue to use the TV without agreeing to the terms. I couldn't use different inputs, or even go to settings from the home screen and disconnect from the internet to disable their services. If I don't agree to their terms, then I don't get access to their new products. That...

Jimmycrackcrack ,

This is disturbing. I wanted to know more so I googled it but I found nothing. Where did you hear this?

Jimmycrackcrack ,

This sounds good and promising but it's should be noted that they do not have to answer to the FTC according to this article, it has merely been recommended in a letter to the FTC by one senator that they should investigate some specific car companies. There doesn't seem to be any new way in which they are more or less accountable to the FTC than they were or weren't already and there's no obligation on the strength of this letter to do any investigation nor any guarantee of a positive outcome if they did. A rare and nice little show of support from a member of the political class for privacy rights but nothing substantive or concrete.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

Hedging my bets in trying to make my statements correct. Phrasing as I did, my statements are true if it's just a few companies under potential scrutiny or all car companies in the US so it's the truest way to write with the facts I haven't my disposal.

Jimmycrackcrack , (edited )

This honestly looks fine. (Assuming this is before the dishwasher has run). There's not like solid chunks of food or anything just the actual stuff that you own a dishwasher to wash off for you so you don't have to. The configuration of the dishes is haphazard and chaotic but if you want to fit a lot of dishes it usually ends up that way. The cup and cup like vessels not being upside down is a problem but for the most part things are upside down or on their side as they should be. I want the dishwasher to wash dishes for me not the other way around. If you get the occasional dish after a cycle that hasn't completely cleaned you have to wash it yourself, which sucks, but that doesn't always happen so there's a reasonable chance you won't have to, and when it does happen, it's still way cleaner than it was so you're talking a cursory fix up of very few dishes. I'd take that over rinsing each and every one every time or having to hand wash half the load when there's a lot of dishes in service of a neater stacking configuration that's optimal but less space efficient.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

I guess I should say "appears haphazard" as I don't know if it really has been stacked with reckless abandon or of it's a kind of organised chaos as the two tend to look very similar. When your colleagues stack the dishwasher at work, they're adding to the load a little at a time until there's literally no room and someone has to run it. In such an instance there's no particular method to their madness other than fitting their one plate or one cup that they're personally trying to deal with.

When you're stacking a full load start to finish you're stacking with the aim of fitting everything you have from a large load of dishes of which really don't want to have any left out. In doing so, I at least, find that while one starts with some attempt at being organized, you'll eventually realise that if you just slightly lift this concave object slightly up so it's still upside down but not completely, you can squeeze this one awkward shaped small object in next to it, and this large flat but not very deep baking dish for which there is now no room on the bottom shelf will juuust fit if I kind of wedge diagonally a little and over the top some cups and small objects which hopefully will be small enough that some water can get between them and spray up and clean the baking dish. In the end it it can look like you put no thought in to it all but you know that you tesselated a 3d puzzle quite nimbly to squash the maximum possible number of dishes in there and then more often than not, despite all the fretting that certain types have over correct stacking, it ends up coming out much the same as when it's a lightly stacked load with optimal spacing. It definitely sometimes doesn't work out that way, but even then, in the absolute worst case scenarios where several dishes, not just one or two, didn't get all the way clean, you need only then unstack those that did clean fully and the remainders are already stacked ready for another cycle right away or to wait til later to make a fuller but hopefully not as full load.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

The democrats seem more... ribbed in this drawing.

Jimmycrackcrack ,

What's the context of this?

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

    •
    Jimmycrackcrack ,

    I can has terrible title?

    Jimmycrackcrack ,

    Haha. That's better, but now my comment doesn't make sense.

    Jimmycrackcrack , (edited )

    It kind of sounds like this is part of a paper that is detailing seemingly large amounts of predation from cats of which the majority is attributable to un-owned cats which I gather you reckon means "outdoor" owned cats aren't a big threat to wildlife populations since they aren't responsible for the greatest amount of the total predation from cats overall.

    But, without the context, the numbers cited sound instinctively like 'big' numbers so if the total magnitude of predation from cats is large and "owned" cats are responsible only for a fraction of it, their contribution could well be substantial nonetheless. Not knowing the scope or the details of the quoted paper it's unclear if it goes in to what the estimated proportion is other than not the majority and its unclear how much predation can be tolerated by the populations upon which cats, both owned and unowned, prey.

    For example maybe owned cats are responsible for 40% of the total predation by cats on local wildlife in an area with the remaining 60% being attributable to un-owned cats. This would make un-owned cats majority responsible for the predation yet you could reduce the total predation by 40% if owned cats were all kept indoors in that hypothetical. The actual numbers are likely different and could well be much more slanted between owned vs un-owned cats' share of predation but if the estimates for the sustainable amount of predation certain populations can withstand are below the current total amount of predation then removing even a smaller fraction might be the difference between endangerment and extinction.

    Jimmycrackcrack ,

    I suspect the middle of nowhere might be worse given that the wilife there might not see a lot of cats normally and could have more vulnerable populations. Probably depends where you live, but if it has rare wildlife you don't see much elsewhere your kitty is possibly bad news for them. Also depending on where you live the wildlife can be dangerous for tje cat too. Eagles and snakes are a worry.

    Adblock: Google did not slow down and lag YouTube performance with ad blocker on - Neowin (www.neowin.net)

    Adblock: Google did not slow down and lag YouTube performance with ad blocker on - Neowin::According to several user reports online, Google was apparently slowing YouTube down if it detected adblockers. However, Adblock has now confirmed that such is not the case at all.

    Jimmycrackcrack ,

    I had forgotten about this so evidently it has stopped, that said I have only ever used ublock origin and it was happening to me, with that on Firefox so I don't know about this theory that it's just that one particular adblocker.

    I find it hard to let go of the idea that Google was doing this, but then again I suppose the fact that it isn't now would suggest they weren't behind it in the first place since the supposed motive for it was to push people to Chrome and if you just stopped doing this after like a month tops then it wouldn't be a particularly effective strategy.

    Jimmycrackcrack ,

    I really feel very uncomfortable with the notion of tracking the kids anyway. Arming them with knowledge as best as possible, and as usual showing interest in their behaviour to try and look as best as possible for signs of problems but ultimately kids are still people with their own lives even if people in development. Yes you need to protect them, to a certain extent, but ultimately some of this is no business but their own. You can try to educate and forewarn and hope some of it sticks but the tendency from my memory of being a kid is that that tends to be met with an eye-roll, this is probably where the temptation comes from to track children or drastically restrict the choices they're able to make so they can't ignore you but this is hardly a great way for that person in development to ultimately... develop.

    This is dicey though, not least because as yet another random person on the internet offering their unsolicited opinion, I don't even have kids, and if you follow my logic to extremis, you basically have, "let the kids just figure it out on their own they'll be fine" which definitely won't apply to everything and can have disastrous consequences in some contexts. But nevertheless I think this concept of tracking, either covertly, or overtly with the intention of making a kind of panopticon effect for the kids, is likely ineffective but even if effective, is indicative of something going wrong with the intent of the surveillance.

    Jimmycrackcrack ,

    If we're going to dive straight in to the pedantry then: a panini, in English speaking countries is usually referring to a heated sandwich made from bread that is a roll (long rather than square, with an outer crust and sliced lengthways in half), usually some form of Italian bread in keeping with the Italian namesake. Panini's as far as I'm aware are filled with anything you want, but specifically are heated, usually (or exclusively?) in a press of some kind. Jaffles are like toasties, I'd personally call them a subset of toastie, heated in a specific type of press called a jaffle machine and made only with sliced, square, toast style bread as you'd likely get in a cheap, pre-sliced and packaged loaf. The type of press is important to qualify as a jaffle, as is the bread type and shape because these machines will only fit certain standardised bread types and needs to seal shut during heating. When you put a filled sandwich (with just about any filling combo but almost always with cheese), built with two, square, toasting slices, in to a jaffle machine the shape of the cavity in this machine forces a diagonal division between two opposing corners of the bread which also squashes the filling in to either of the two bread triangles formed on either side of this diagonal. The section of dividing line between the triangles compresses the two slices of bread together in that section, which gets particularly hot and forms a snappable, dark coloured ridge between the two halves of the jaffle. When your jaffle is done, it comes out as a single object with the two halves stuck together by the dividing line, but to eat, you typically apply pressure to each opposing half causing the brittle, dividing line to snap giving you two triangular halves of a sandwich with filling completely sealed inside.

    You could perhaps say 'who calls a panini a toastie for $500?', because toasties have a much broader, looser definition like paninis. Even though the classic 'toastie' will more likely be similar to a jaffle, (though crucially not heated in a jaffle machine and thus not having the jaffle shape imposed upon it), it could actually be any bread and just about any filling (though almost always including cheese), much like a panini.

    I really don't like jaffles and I have noticed a decline in their popularity as I've gotten older. They are a good idea in theory, but in practice, because the machine crimps the perimeter of the bread slices together and also the dividing line between the halves as well, you end up with burning hot filling and steam sealed and squashed inside of two bulged areas, one for each triangle. Those crimped edges and dividing line mean eating one involves a chore of biting through a lot of plain, unfilled, nearly burned toast before getting to all the filling which having been trapped inside is ridiculously hot and inevitably burns you. It also means that, the contents tends to get kind of steamed during cooking, making things quite flabby. Much prefer a toastie made in a sandwich press, which is basically a panini press minus the grill lines.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines
    •