What a good family man, supporting both his wife's and his daughter's sex work careers while being wholly unafraid to expose the six younger groin gremlins to the family trade. Grandma must be so proud of the Proud Boy she raised, surely.
All joking aside, his stripper daughter (brunette) has an ass so flat that the only thing proving she's not MTF is how lame her posture is. Ain't gonna make no good money with that half-ass attitude, sweetie.
Meanwhile little Arthur Ryan down in front getting giddy thinking about how he gonna be the coolest 20-something in his cell block when he grows up.
Just love how while we're all doing our own thing, here these two shitasses are printing out seven more useful idiots for the Trumplicans to add to their collection. Fan-fucking-tastic.
Assuming you are asking in good faith. The Christian/Evangelicals are the prominent group of people screaming about values and banning drag and other things they hate (LGBTQ, healthcare/abortion, immigration, voting, etc), while simultaneously being seemingly ok with stuff like this. It is quite blatantly hypocritical. It's all projection and hypocrisy and bigotry.
It's not the evangelicals alone, the party itself is using the argument "for the children" as a cudgel to beat the opposition with. They want to say they simply find trans people and anyone who does drag disgusting, but they have to use the children as an example of innocence being ruined by their opposition.
It's just a political weapon, and as usual for Republicans it's "rules for thee and none for me."
Exactly! And if you go look up the statistics, even accounting for populations and all that you will find that it is RELIGIOUS LEADERS and FAMILY (uncles and cousins or parents I think) that commit most of the CSA. Not drag queens or trans people.
If they ACTUALLY cared about protecting kids they would be going after every church with full investigations and lawsuits galore. Instead they cover them up and brush them off with drivel like "Oh well he wasn't a Christian then" despite the fact they probably were a pastor or youth leader and did it in the church building itself many times.
I feel bad for the children in this picture. Personally I think this is child abuse. Forcing politics / religion on children should be fucking illegal.
Personally I think this is child abuse. Forcing politics / religion on children should be fucking illegal.
That's hard though. The kids obviously have fun, it's a game for them.
So what's the abuse? Them giving the finger? Come on... Them unknowingly giving a (wrong?) political message? Yeah, we all know where that would lead to.
From my experience growing up going to a Baptist church this is a Christians wet dream. You would think indoctrination or religion is illegal based on some sermons I've had to sit through.
Right, this one has a hip strap, like a belt, and a thigh strap. The one I've seen uses two thigh straps, so just two around the leg, instead of one around the waist.
I have a fanny pack/ bum bag that I use for surfing. Having an extra strap to hold it flat on my thigh would be super useful, but it has to be watertight.
Edit: for anyone confused, yes, those two terms refer to the same thing, we just call it a different thing depending on which side of the pond you're on. As I understand it, fanny refers to something quite different in the UK.
If that was the intentent, I get it. But if you're going to flip the bird you should at least send it INTO the camera to enforce the message. This just feels stupid.
