Welcome to Incremental Social! Learn more about this project here!
Check out lemmyverse to find more communities to join from here!

SkyNTP ,

Unfortunately, the US political system does not have a feature to "dislike" all the candidates. Not without a major, probably bloody, revolution, anyway. Your choice is to support and pick one candidate, or let everyone else pick the candidate for you.

TonyTonyChopper ,
@TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz avatar

I'm ready for the third option tbh

MacNCheezus ,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

You can always write in your own candidate. Not that it's likely to sway the vote in any significant way, but at least it might help you feel better about your choice.

EmperorHenry ,
@EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Good luck explaining that nuance to the average shit-lib.

UBoat237 ,

Even though I'm a Libertarian in the strictest sense I find this both true and quite funny. DJT is just as bad or worse than Biden. DJT himself has stated that he went to St. James island [aka orgy island] TWICE. It's just like in sinning against GOD...the first look isn't sinning, but when you look the 2nd time then it's a sin. DJT is similar to a DON in a mafia, but he is just the DON of the deep state. The only way to stop Trump is to declare the 2020 election in his favor, HOWEVER since he voluntarily left the oath of office for the Biden admin DJT cannot be legally elected a 3rd term. He would be disqualified.

bouldering_barista ,

Yeah, but.... Oftentimes criticizing Biden helps trump. I'd rather not even risk it at this point.

Can we spend more energy celebrating that trump is NOT the president and how bad it would be if he comes back?

glimse ,

Criticizing Biden is totally fine. It's the pressure from these posters to not vote for Biden out of principle that's the problem.

Biden is flubbing the Gaza situation hard but he's still (unfortunately) our only chance to keep Trump out of office.

This post should really say "Just because we dislike Biden doesn't mean we shouldn't vote for him"

alcoholicorn ,

Telling the DNC that you and most people will vote for him unconditionally is sabotaging his chances; the dems need to understand they cannot win if they continue the path they're on, and telling them otherwise is counterproductive.

Silencing criticism of millions isn't gonna win an election. Doing the things the people whose votes you need are telling you to do will.

TheFriar ,

Well, the problem is, the way the US sees it, keeping Israel as an ally is more important than Joe Biden. Yes, even if that means fascism comes humping an American flag. You can still be at the top of the postwar order with a fascist in charge!

MindTraveller ,

The DNC are not on Lemmy.

alcoholicorn ,

Yeah, but they're listening to public sentiment.

If public sentiment is "everyone's gonna vote for Biden no matter what", they're not gonna change the course, and then be shocked when they get blown out worse than they did in 2016.

MindTraveller ,

If the public sentiment is that we're gonna vote for Biden no matter what, then when the election comes we'll vote for Biden ....no matter what.

What you're describing is if the DNC hear "blue no matter who", but what they hear isn't reflective of reality. Meanwhile, what we want is for everyone to vote blue no matter who, but give the DNC a good scare into getting their act together.

So what we absolutely need to do is be critical of Biden when the DNC are watching, but stress the dangers of a Trump presidency when they're not paying attention.

And the DNC are not on Lemmy. So Lemmy is where we should say blue no matter who. We can go criticise Biden on Facebook or whatever boomers use these days. But there's no point in it on Lemmy, except when we're saying to vote for him in the election and kill him in the revolution.

HauntedCupcake ,

The problem is that people are dumb, and plenty are legitimately not planning on voting for Biden now.

If and when Biden deals with Gaza, everyone with this mindset immediately needs to turn around and start sucking off Biden with previously unseen vigor and determination, otherwise this is only going to damage his chance of being elected. Hell, even then I still see some damage being done.

It just seems irresponsible to spread this message, especially when people like OP seem to genuinely believe it. Pick a less blatantly fascist opponent than Trump to do this with ffs

alcoholicorn , (edited )

If and when Biden deals with Gaza, everyone with this mindset immediately needs to turn around and start sucking off Biden with previously unseen vigor and determination, otherwise this is only going to damage his chance of being elected.

There's tens of thousands of mostly children dead, and Israel is using famine and disease to wipe out the rest, no shit it damages Biden's chances if his actions come this late. Especially if Biden's answer to Gaza is ship Israel weapons more quietly while claiming to hold up shipments, while Israel starves Gaza out.

Then again, if Biden stops the money and arms to Israel, and sanctions Israel, and Trump responds by promising money and arms to Israel so they can resume the genocide, I don't see how anyone could not vote Biden.

HauntedCupcake ,

Totally agree, he's already damaging his own reputation, which is why the "do not vote for Biden" game can even be played.

I'm just far more terrified of what Trump will do to Gaza, and Biden is just the lesser of two evils

alcoholicorn ,

What more can be done? We are already sending 100% of the weapons, money, and diplomatic support Israel needs. We're already bombing Yemen for taking actions to stop Israel and shooting down Iranian drones trying to stop them. Is Trump going to do the same thing, but be proud of it?
Shit I can't even say that, Biden is extremely proud of his support for Israel. Trump is simply going to be more obnoxious about it.

Lesser evilism isn't gonna win an election when your lesser evil is already genocide.

HauntedCupcake ,

The US has nukes, and much bigger traditional ballistics than what's currently being sent.

If Biden really really wanted to, Gaza wouldn't exist anymore

alcoholicorn ,

Israel has nukes. They're not using them, or chemical weapons because it would be sanctioned to an extent that even the US couldn't help them.

Israel actions are not limited by the size of the bombs they're being given.

db0 ,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

You surely realize they can't use nukes there, right?

HauntedCupcake ,

That's why I mentioned the other traditional methods

db0 ,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

you also mentioned nukes. Why?

supersquirrel ,

Gaza situation

Sorry, call it how it is, the Palestinian genocide

technocrit ,

TBH many "leftists" (aka grifters, shills, fash...) do like trump.

turtletracks ,

So... Not leftists?

ramenshaman ,

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

Sanctus ,
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

Most are referring to the way our current electoral system works. Voting 3rd party helps the Republicans even if its not intentional.

Seraph ,
@Seraph@kbin.social avatar

Yup, and the only way out of that is Ranked Choice Voting.

Go volunteer for your local RCV group, California's is here: https://www.calrcv.org/

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

Sanctus ,
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

Nobody thinks its a magic bullet, we're all looking for the next rung that leads us closer to a happy democracy. None of us are looking for instant easy solutions, we're trying to iterate and be better.

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

Cornelius_Wangenheim , (edited )

In other words, It's necessary but not sufficient for reforming the two party system.

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

mindbleach ,

Obligatory: "Ranked Choice" is a specific use of ranked ballots. It's subpar. It beats what we're doing now, but anything beats what we're doing now.

What you want is a Condorcet method like Ranked Pairs, where the winner is whoever beats everyone else. RCV just picks whoever can scrounge together 50% first. RCV would not elect a candidate who is literally everyone's second choice. Ranked Pairs would.

The simple alternative is Approval Voting, where you let people check all the names they like. It matches Condorcet results... somehow. There is no good reason we're not using it everywhere.

Seraph ,
@Seraph@kbin.social avatar

Approval Voting seems to just dilute your vote the more candidates you vote for. Candidates will tell people people to only place one vote. What a silly system.

mindbleach ,

Your worst-case scenario is how things currently work.

Realistically, people will just ignore that shite advice, and vote for as many people as they feel like. It works out on average.

ephemeral_gibbon ,

But ranked choice is easy to implement and in practice if everyone would put a candidate second they aren't likely to be knocked out in the first round. There are very limited practical examples where it doesn't provide the optimal outcome.

It also seems to have some level of support and momentum in the US and it seems to me like it'd be better not to get caught in the weeds fighting over which new voting system should be implemented there.

mindbleach ,

Approval is trivial.

Ranked Pairs has the same ballots as Ranked Choice and it works the way people think ranked ballots work.

RCV has momentum primarily because people keep using the name to mean "ranked ballots."

AlDente ,

This is absurd. Take a look at the polls. There is only one 3rd-party candidate with double digit percentages. Do you really think JFK is taking more votes from Biden than Trump?

TexasDrunk ,

Maybe. A lot of folks only know him for his good environmental stance and see him as the rightful Democrat candidate.

They don't see his antivax bullshit and leaky brain from WiFi.

TrickDacy ,

Taking the risk because you think you know something you can't know is what's absurd

AlDente ,

I never made any indication on how I'm voting. I'm just tired of this baseless claim that voting 3rd party only helps Trump. Polls excluding 3rd-parties show Trump significantly further ahead than those with 3rd-parties. Therefore, Biden's only chance of winning is due to JFK capturing conservative votes.

TrickDacy ,

TIL "how America works" = "baseless claim"

AlDente ,

What is "how America works" in this context? You seem to be trying to make the point that 3rd-party voting only hurts Biden. I'm pointing to recent polling that shows that, when 3rd-party options are included, Biden's margins get closer to victory. You should be thanking 3rd-parties if you are hoping for a Biden victory.

TrickDacy ,

So polling, that thing that told us trump couldn't have won in 2016, makes another prediction, eh?

Maeve ,

Yet Robert Reich has said the same thing.

papertowels ,

A different way to think about it - most of the intended audience on Lemmy, and especially in this community, would've voted democrat instead of republican. So from the frame of reference of this post, most folks here claiming to vote third party did in fact have their vote "taken" from Biden.

LazyPhilosopher ,
AFC1886VCC ,

Liberal democracy has to win every election, fascism only has to win one. Good job if you win in 2024, now do it again every 4 years

Hackworth ,

Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.

Zipitydew ,

Good gets lazy. It has too much hope in others also being good.

RagingRobot ,

We have been doing it for over 200 years now though

papertowels ,

Ehhhh, things are looking a little dicey...

xor ,

same strawman argument constantly repeated by people who neglect to criticize trump or russia….

nobody on lemmy like biden… stop pretending like you’re trying to educate people

goferking0 ,

Sadly there are people on lemmy who like Biden and think he can do no wrong

xor ,

not really… there was just a huge wave of “genocide joe” people who somehow were completely incapable of saying anything bad about trump….

stuff like “libs = genocide, gop doesn’t”… but without ever directly saying gop….

goferking0 ,

There are definitely people who think he can do no wrong, check out worlds politics sub.

Funny how you still managed to being up those pointing out his flaws while saying no one is saying he can do no wrong

xor ,

that sentence doesn’t even make sense….

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

disguy_ovahea ,

Critiques are necessary. We don’t owe electors loyalty. They owe us representation.

With that being said, when it comes to voting, inaction is action.

mindbleach ,

You owe it to the country to not hand our government over to fascism. Voting for the immediate alternative isn't a blood pact.

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

disguy_ovahea ,

I’m sorry if my comment implied disagreement. It was meant to support and reinforce your point, not counter it.

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

disguy_ovahea ,

No worries. I wrote with conviction. I see how that can come across as argumentative.

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

Tryptaminev ,

Without backing it up, the critique is worthless.

"No Joeboy, i don't like it that you killed all the brown kids on the playground. But since you are my favorite child we will still get ice cream for you now."

Would you parent a child like this? It is doomed to fail. You are all setting yourself up to continuously get fucked by both the DNC and the Reps.

mindbleach ,

Fuck your analogy.

One of two people is going to be in charge of the country seven months from now. You can have the boring liberal with an awful allegiance to a questionable ally run by a power-hungry bastard... or you can have our very own power-hungry bastard, who is also going to give the aforementioned bastard everything he wants.

Don't choose more evil.

TexasDrunk ,

Someone is getting that ice cream. Let's make it the kid who is trying to murder the parents and take over the family and will kill even more brown kids while throwing tantrums.

Tryptaminev ,

Someone is getting that ice cream

And that is your failure as a people. You raised your politicians into knowing that they will get their ice cream regardless of what they do. And you are currently reinforcing it, instead of saying: You have 5 month to fix your shit. If you fix it, there will be a big bucket of ice cream, otherwise no.

TexasDrunk , (edited )

No, that's the system we inherited. And some of us are working to fix it. Later this year one of those two kids is getting that ice cream no matter what I say about it. To pretend otherwise makes you an idiot, a liar, or a jackass.

Your failures as a person are bad analogies, bad analysis, and ignoring the fact that anything else we do kills even more brown people. But I suspect that's what you like. You're mad he's not killing enough of them.

So be mad. You're a bad actor and this conversation is over. I'm not responding to you for you, but for anyone else reading that wants to know why you love killing brown people.

Edit: Downvotes from people who are trying to get extra genocide because there's not enough currently are absolutely welcome. I'm glad you disagree with me.

bolexforsoup , (edited )
spoiler

asdfasfasfasfas

TexasDrunk ,

It's an idiot trying to make a terrible point.

daltotron ,

https://youtu.be/rTymqnpfPWo

I dunno I'm just gonna leave this here I guess

Facebones ,

Its literally impossible for democrats to not spread disinformation about leftists by claiming anyone who doesn't vote Biden is actively advocating for not voting. Hell I see a bunch of it in this comment section.

Democrats will claim they aren't fascist but they can't help but check off all the bullet points.

Son_of_dad ,

The timing maybe? I've been saying Biden is the worst example of a democrat since the Obama days, and got downvoted about pointing out his bullshit. His contribution to the drug war alone is atrocious. But I kept getting down voted for saying it. Suddenly now it's election time, second go round, and here comes everyone jumping on Biden. Seems sus.

DadVolante ,
@DadVolante@sh.itjust.works avatar

We have lived under presidencies of both Biden and Trump.

It isn't sus to realize one is better than the other, dude

Son_of_dad ,

Huh? That's what I'm saying, Biden is a saint compared to Trump. It's just sus that right now, at election time 2024 is when it's suddenly a big deal. It only benefits Trump

Strykker ,

Your wording was probably a little confusing, I read "jumping on Biden" initially as in "voting / rooting for him", but you likely meant it in the context of them "questioning everything he does". Depending which one is used changes your phrasing from criticizing Biden to supporting him.

HelixDab2 ,

Thing is, the absolutely worst things that he's done throughout his career have been pretty mainstream at the time. Like that omnibus crime bill? That was overwhelmingly supported, with only very, very limited Democratic opposition in very limited areas. (And a lot of black communities still support 'tough on crime' approaches because they look at the short term rather than the long.)

Even the support of Israel is pretty middle-of-the-road. Most Dems still support Israel, even while being appalled at the indiscriminate nature of Israel's violence in Gaza

electric_nan ,

To everyone in this thread, whoever you are or are not voting for: what is your plan if Trump wins? I think everyone agrees that it is pretty much 50/50 on him winning. What do you plan to do about the coming total fascist hellscape? Do you have plans and means to emigrate? Are you buying guns and ammo? Are you just gonna go along to get along?

Bye ,

Picking up my shit and moving to the EU, maybe northern Spain. I have zero idea how to buy housing there (I’m a citizen though) but a bit of uncertainty is better than the alternative.

sabreW4K3 ,
@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al avatar

Swap Biden for Starmer and Trump for Sunak 🙂‍↕️

towerful ,

Well, if the Tories get back in then deporting people to Rwanda and expansion of oil drilling in the north sea will be guaranteed.
Voting for lab, there is a chance that these will be cancelled.

Tories have had decades in charge, and shit is fucked.
Labour are more progressive - not enough for my taste, but better than constant austerity

sabreW4K3 ,
@sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al avatar

I stand by what I said

Just because we
dislike
Starmer doesn't mean
we
support Sunak.

towerful ,

Yup. Such is a 2-party system.
Vote for the less-evil

alcoholicorn ,

What's the chance Starmer does 80% of what the Tories would have done, then the Tories get a supermajority next election?

I'm just an American, so IDK, but I've seen two democratic majorities in my lifetime, both of which played out that way.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • incremental_games
  • meta
  • All magazines